June 5, 2009

remarkable lines

"Many that I brought on were also agents of the Vatican. I learned that the hard way. But it was a learning process, and I'm not afraid to bring them on again. Because this time, maybe I know a little bit more. And through what I've learned to the people on this show that were really enlighten me through the word of God, I can bring it on: if they can not mention it, this connection, I will. And perhaps together we can again expose the Vatican for what they really are: a bunch of criminals who are hiding behind and using the word of God to lie to people. They have many shills, they have shills all over – I can name a hundred right now. But guess who their main one is – it's Jesus Christ."
Greg Szymanski
"Consequently the idea is that god created the whole heavens and the whole earth and he owns everything on it, and so therefore he turned it over to his son, Jesus, his son. But since Jesus isn't here, somebody has to run this place. So, since Jesus isn't here, the Pope said I will be the Vicar of Christ. I'll stand in for him till he gets back. Then when he gets back, I'll turn over the whole world to Christ, but until he gets here, I'm in charge! Okay? As long as you understand that, we're going to do just fine. Now, the first thing the Pope did after declaring himself the Vicar of Christ, made himself the owner of all life on the earth, for Jesus. Jesus owned the whole earth but he ain't here, so I do. Second: he made a contract with the King of England. It was a commercial treaty of sorts with the King of England in which he gave the possessions of Jesus which he held as the Vicar of Christ to the King of England as a corporate holding company. So, the whole world would be under the King of England FOR the Pope. So the Pope owns it but the president of the corporation is the King of England, and that whole corporation menagerie is called 'The Crown'. So when you hear about the British Crown, you have to understand that there is a world of difference between being Engl-ish and Brit-ish. British comes from an Hebrew word, berith. A 'berith' is a contract in the old Hebrew language, and 'ish' is a man or men. Therefore berith-ish becomes british – man of the contract."
Jordan Maxwell
"When you have organized religion, you have a priesthood and everybody else is the laity."
Eric Phelps
"Mystery is the very heart of Roman Catholicism. Pope Paul VI's Encyclical on the Eucharist is titled 'Mysterium Fidei' (Secret of Faith). Vaticanum II (Oct. 1962 - Dec. 1965) refers repeatedly to the 'Mystery of the Eucharist'. The Vatican's new universal Catechism declares that all of the churches liturgy is Mystery! And that its aim is to initiate souls into the Mystery of Christ. It is Mystagogy!" Dave Hunt
"So, the whole Bush dynasty is Knight of Columbus with Jeb Bush, Knights of Malta, Bonesmen, Freemasons and Jesuits. In that family alone you see the unity of all the most powerful secret societies which further proofs our point that all these secret societies work together, subject to the Jesuit order."
Eric Phelps
"The once Murdoch sold them the idea, that let's not just censor news and not tell people the truth about the Reichskonkordat, about the 300-mile wide Pentagram, let's turn it into entertainment, they loved him, and that's why he succeded: he is the great entertainer."
Frank O'Collins
"The papacy has put together an infrastructure here in the U.S. to carry out a North American Jewish Holocaust as well as the Holocaust against true Bible believers and any 'enemies of the state'."
Eric Phelps
Once you begin to see how words and terms and symbols are used, and of course symbols are extraordinarily important in world affairs. If you don't think so, if you don't understand the concept of how important symbols are, put a swastika on your arm and go to your local synagoge and watch the reaction you get. Symbols mean things to people, and the powers that be in this world have set up a world of symbols and emblembs and terms and catch phrases, and once you understand how this system works, it's fascinating! Because for the first time, the world opens up to you a whole new perspective on how government works, on how banks work, on how institutions and education … why we have something called "The Police". Where does the word "Sheriff" come from. Why do you have go-vern-ment.
Once you begin to see how these words are used and put together, all of the sudden it opens up a whole new perspective on how stuff is happening. Because in the world today most people look at the things which are happening in this world and they can't make heads and tails out of it. It doesn't make any sense at all. It's destructive, it's lunacy, it's chaos. But in point of fact, the things which are happening in this world are not chaos at all. It is very well planned, organized and directed. There is an hidden agenda, so to speak."
Jordan Maxwell
"The Pope authorized the invasion of Ireland and sent the king a ring of investiture as Lord of Ireland."
Richard Bennett
"Greg, is America just a big invasion of bodysnatchers or anyone of these movies, you know, the ones where a shadowy enemy changes the pattern the way people think, and we are the outsiders with the problem? Because that is the way I feel."
"Thousands of proofs, incidents of conversation, questions put at long intervals on delicate points, and imperceptible circumstances of the drama, have always resulted in an agreement so exact, positive, and formal, that truth alone could produce such perfect coaptation. [...] I have no doubt, therefore, if the authenticity of the narrative become the subject of serious discussion, that narrator will rise victorious over every difficulty that can be raised up against him. [...] Now, the Theocratic genius, founding its domination on the alleged interests of God – covering them with the impenetrable veil of the Sanctuary – marching with the infinite resources aquired in a long practice of confession, in a profound study of the human heart, and in the arsenal of all the seductions of matter and mysticism, taking for the auxiliaries of its inimitable design human passions, obscurity, and time – the Theocratic genius – if, with a deliberate consciousness of its aim, it has constituted itself a hierarchical militia, detached from all ties of affection – must necessarily carry to its maximum of concentration and energy that politic spirit before which persons and the morality of actions disappear, and which retains but one human sentiment and one moral principle – that of absolute devotedness to the animus of the corporation, to its aim and its triumph."
Victor Considérant
"The Columbian system goes back to the Columbian faction of the Illuminati, back in the early 1700s, not the late 17th. You began to see why Space Shuttle is called Columbia. You have Columbia University, Columbia Pictures, Columbia Broadcasting. Columbia is a very interesting word, and it's connected to the Jesuits. Incidently, the Jesuits are very pronouncely involved in the destiny of this country. The Jesuit order is very much involved in the founding of this country and the direction of its politics. Georgetown University, from which many of the presidents and big shots in government get their education, is a Jesuit university."
Jordan Maxwell
"Today when you see, once a year, at the State of the Union, when you see the president comes out and the Speaker of the House says: 'Ladies and Gentlemen, the President of the United States', everybody in this country thinks this is the President of America. America doesn't have a president. This is a corporate term used in business. The United States Corporation is a privately owned company. It's privately owned. And it's a ten miles square that it operates in called 'The District of Columbia'. 'Columbia' simply means universal. This is what 'Catholic' means: universal. When you start tracing back the ownership of the corporation called 'United States' privately owned company, then you began to see that, if you say that you are a citizen of the U.S., what you're saying lawfully is that you are an employee of a foreign corporation on the International Maritime Admiralty Law. You are an employee of a privately owned company."
Jordan Maxwell
"All of these things in the 4th session of the Council of Trent are condemned, anybody who believes in freedom of speech, and freedom of conscience, and freedom of the press.
So, those maxims of the Council of Trent are brought into The Protocols when The Protocols condemn freedom of conscience. They condemn freedom of the press. They condemn national governments and national sovereignty."
Eric Phelps
"Diego Laynez went on to be the Jesuit General after Loyola. Laynez was the second Jesuit General. He was the master-mind of the Council of Trent. Laynez was a Jesuit by allegiance, and a Jew by race. This is very important. And it's the result of Laynez being a Jew, when this was brought to light in 1593, that the Order passed a statute that no Jew could ever be in the Jesuit order again. This is very important. This is why Weishaupt was not a Jew. It was against the constitutions of the Order for a Jew to be in the Order."
Eric Phelps

object of uniformity

To avoid entering into too great detail about the Jesuit Petre, I will only quote some extracts from the reports of the Tuscan Ambassador in London, Terriesi, quoted by Taunton […]:
"Writing to the Grand Duke (July 22, 1686) he says: 'Let your Highness prepare to hear continually fresh news of this country both as to its temporal and spiritual affairs. For the King seems determined to push forward in matters of religion as far as he can. And the Jesuit Petre, who governs him, is the man to force him to extremes without a thought as to the consequences. He says plainly that Protestants believe 'that the Jesuits are at present the primum mobile of the government.'" "Writing December 30, 1686, he says:
'The Jesuit Father Petre rules His Majesty's mind more than ever.'
"Writing August 15, 1687, Terriesi says : 'The report they [the people] circulate, ascribing all the trouble to the Jesuits' counsel, by which they say His Majesty is completely governed, is most intolerable to the King. Yet I believe it in a great measure to be a calumny, still, as His Majesty has the Jesuits so constantly with him, it causes suspicions, which will be worse if Father Petre becomes Cardinal, as it is said the King certainly wishes.'"

The Jesuit Petre attained to the height of his political activity on November the 11th, 1687, when James II made him a member of the Privy Council. As Privy Councillor Petre took an oath of allegiance, which would naturally suggest some scruples from a Catholic point of view. But that is where the use of the Jesuit maxim, "the end sanctifies the means," would come in.
Petre accepted his political office by express permission of the Provincial of the English Province, the Jesuit John Keynes, and with the silent consent at any rate of General Gonzalez himself. A letter, dated January 8, 1688, from the General to the English Provincial does certainly express "surprise" that Petre should have been allowed by the Provincial to accept an office "implying interference with matters forbidden by the statutes of the Order", but it does not contain a word of blame, let alone a command to relinquish the office. The letter ends with an assurance that the General would consult his assistants on the matter. As Petre retained his office undisturbed even after this consultation, it may be concluded that it ended in approval of Petre's political office. This conclusion is all the more justified as, if there had been the slightest sign of disapproval, the Jesuit authors would certainly have pointed it out. But they have maintained a profound silence.

Taunton concludes his account of the Jesuit Petre with these trenchant words:
"It is the custom to speak sternly of Petre's foolhardy conduct, and to accuse him of ambition. I think historians have not, as a rule, understood the full position of the case. Petre has been made the scapegoat for others. I do not wish to extenuate his responsibility for the catastrophe, but I do think the chief blame rests on other shoulders. If he were free from ambition, who then were the ambitious men?
Petre, like a good Jesuit, was in the hands of his superiors perinde ac cadaver. It was therefore the superiors of the Society who were the ambitious men. They and they alone are primarily guilty of the fall of the Stuarts. Hitherto they have escaped, while Petre has borne the opprobrium. The General, the Provincial and the Confessor are the real culprits. If, as we know, from a letter dated 3rd March, 1688, the Provincial had, without the leave of the General, allowed Petre to accept the office of Privy Councillor, still the General tolerated it. Considering that they knew all about the man, and yet left him in this position. Considering that they allowed him to take the oath and become a Privy Councillor, who can now say that they were not the ambitious men? The libido dominandi eats into a Society as well as into persons, and more easily where the individual gives up all personal ambition and makes the Society his all in all."

The historians of the Order do not speak of Petre and his political doings unless absolutely obliged to do so. They mostly prefer to ignore the existence of a Jesuit Petre. That is to say, they pass him over in absolute silence. In modern times the Jesuit Duhr is conspicuous for such silence. In his voluminous work of 975 pages, Jesuiten-Fabeln published in a fourth edition in 1904, Petre is only mentioned once in a superficial remark (p. 674), though thirty pages are devoted to the court confessors of the Order and their doings, but Petre does not exist for him.
This silence of Duhr's is all the more striking, considering that eighteen years before (1886-87), in the Zeitschrift für Katholische Theologie, he attempted the defence of Petre in long articles. And in 1904 not a word of such defence, not even a reference to it. Duhr must have had a feeling that it would be best not to reopen the topic of Petre.

From Duhr's defence of 1886-87 we may report as curiously characteristic that it is almost exclusively restricted to refuting the reproach of Petre's having aspired ambitiously to the dignity of a cardinal. This was impossible, he asserts, since Petre, as a professed member
of the Society of Jesus, had taken a vow not to aspire after such dignities. Duhr ignores almost completely the far more serious reproach of political activity, also forbidden
by the Constitutions of the Order, and seals his very extensive defence of his fellow-Jesuit Petre with this assertion: "There are no facts nor authentic, irrefutable conclusions to
justify the accusation brought against the Jesuit Petre. But if incontestable proof should be brought against Father Petre, there would be absolutely no reason why we should hesitate to recognise it, for it would be no more reasonable to reproach an Order of the Catholic Church for having one wicked member than the company of the Apostles on account of one Judas. In any case, truth must prevail."

That is Duhr all over, or rather the Jesuit spirit. The facts, that for years Petre exercised unlimited political influence, that he officially held a political post involving work contrary to the statutes of the Order, as even the General was obliged to confess, these facts, and authentic, irrefutable conclusions drawn from them, exist. And yet he clamours for facts to justify the accusations. Jesuit and ultramontane authors in general know their public.

The comparison between the Order of the Jesuits and the company of the Apostles, among whom there had also been a Judas, is also characteristic. There we have, first of all, the genuine Jesuit arrogance: The company of the Apostles = the Order of the Jesuits. Well, why not? The Order of the Jesuits is the Society of Jesus. But then there is a suggestion of confession and resignation in the reference to Judas, after all, the Jesuit Petre may possibly have been a Judas. How strange, then, that the Superiors of the Order always gave this Judas the highest praise and entrusted him, even after he had played his political, his "Judas" part in England, up to his death in 1699, with the most important offices, as Duhr himself reports! In this way the likeness to Judas extends really to the Superiors of the Order, and the above-quoted opinion of Taunton is thus confirmed. […]

The Jesuit Viller also speaks some plain words, which throw a strong light on the attitude of the Jesuit Order towards the office of princely confessor. Viller, Father Confessor of Archduke Charles of Styria, was one of the most influential Jesuits of Austria. For many years he filled the most important posts in the Order – those of Rector and Provincial. Because of the great favour he enjoyed at court, he had many envious enemies, who denounced him secretly to the General. He defended himself in several long and outspoken letters. On June 8, 1598, he wrote to the Jesuit Duras, German Assistant to General Acquaviva: "In the early days of our Society we all rejoiced if one of us found favour with a prince, and our efforts were directed towards the end of winning the favour of princes. Now there are some who are angry and envious if any one is in favour and labours with good result. Under the pretence of virtue they show zeal for the discipline of the Society and are filled with envy."

In a letter addressed by the Jesuit Francisco Antonio, Confessor to the Empress Maria, wife of Maximilian II, to the General Mercurian, on April 30, 1576, we read: "There is not a bishop, ambassador, or lord who would not desire to have some Jesuits in attendance. The door [to the princely courts] which is closed by the vows after profession, appears in a fashion to be reopened in this way. For there is no lack of those who seek after such posts with princes, and this leads to many abuses. In the first place they grow accustomed to a certain liberty, which is little in harmony with our rules. […] Finally, there is little spiritual advantage to be gained by it: it leads to ill reports about the Society, as people notice that our members tolerate considerable abuses at the courts or else refuse to see them, only because they desire to enjoy this liberty and honour." […]

The following is from an Italian manuscript preserved in the Bibliotheque Nationale in Paris: "Instruction to princes as to the manner in which the Jesuits rule": "As among the reports which the Provincials send in, there are also some which deal with the character, inclinations and intentions of the various princes, the General and his Assistants in Rome are placed in a position to survey and judge of the political state of the world and to regulate the attitude of the Order in accordance with its own interests. In particular, the confessions, which a great many of the Catholic nobility and many Catholic princes make to the Jesuits, are a means of procuring for the Order a knowledge of important matters, an object for which princes have to pay large sums to ambassadors and spies, but which now only costs the Jesuits the money for postage. In the same manner they also learn the disposition of the subjects and know which of them are well-disposed to the princes and which are not. […] In Rome the Jesuits constantly swarm around the cardinals, ambassadors and prelates, and inquire about everything that occurs or is about to occur, and try to turn it to their own advantage, so that events of importance often have an entirely different issue from that which the princes desire. The greater part of the business of Christendom passes through their hands. They prevailed on Gregory XIII to order all legates and nuncios to take Jesuits as their companions and confidants. […] Jesuits who are taken into the confidence of a prince seek advice immediately of the General about matters of importance and follow his directions."

Macaulay sums up his judgment in these words: "They glided from one Protestant country to another, under innumerable disguises, as gay Cavaliers, as simple rustics, as Puritan preachers."
Crétineau-Joly, who writes in the pay of the Order, takes up a peculiar position. He cannot deny the enormous influence of the Jesuit Order on the political conditions of Europe. But he discovers a theory of justification. "In the intention of Loyola politics were certainly excluded from his institution, but in the sixteenth century all matters of the court and diplomacy, and even the wars, had a religious basis. […] The Jesuits were, therefore, compelled to intervene in political and social movements."

And feeling that he has thus cleared the way, he boldly bears testimony to the gigantic political power of the Order. "Colbert, Louvois, Seignelai, Pontchartrain, and Croissy, the Ministers of Louis XIV, were encompassed by the counsels of Father Antoine Verjus SJ. The Marshal of Luxemburg and Villars sought his opinion in affairs of importance. The Count of Crecy, the French ambassador at the German Reichstag, did not wish to be the only one deprived of the illumination of the Jesuits. He besought Louis XIV to obtain for him this diplomatic helper from the Superiors of the Order, and accordingly Father Verjus was instructed [by his Superiors] to repair to Germany. There the breadth of his intellect and the moderation of his character soon won for him the regard of Catholic and even Protestant princes. Baron von Schwerin, ambassador of the Elector of Brandenburg, Grote, the Hanoverian ambassador, both zealous Lutherans, were among his best friends. […] The most celebrated parliamentarians [of France] followed the pious counsels of Jean Crasset SJ."

Me) The "libido dominandi" – that's exactly what our entire, all possessive catholicized mainstream culture is mostly driven by for centuries since the institution came into existence: dominating the other, making belief to get obedience. That's what happens on all levels with every single line of thought, always. Everywhere! No democracy at all can breath with an attitude like this. Therefrom also this permanent fever, this stress, this mania to convince somebody, to proselytize the neighbour in one way or another. Catholic souls are trained for this their whole life. Always wanting to be right, always wanting to be the best subject/superior possible, always being well-behaved, pride soldiers of some sort. A life totally after concepts and guidelines ... Rome has successfully turned Jesus into an autocrat, its autocrat. Its absolutist caesar, its pop icon, for the world. So-called christianity produces right now its own pharaoh, the infallible fuehrer. What could be more spectacular than this! How? Through Jesuitical education and Hollywood television first and foremost, through false flag laws, false flag news, false flag money, false flag idols like Francis of Assisi & Shakespeare, Mozart & The Beatles, and false flag market structures. Through the same amount of false flage terror as well as false flag kindness. Amen.
"The Order of the Jesuits is the Society of Jesus."
They feel themselves literally as walking Jesuses on earth with their Roman king over everything, the godlike General Secretary aka "Christus quasi praesens".

"I'm personally convinced of the great power and deep significance of Christianity, and I won't allow any other religion to be promoted. That is why I have turned away from Ludendorff and that is why I reject that book by Rosenberg. It was written by a Protestant. It is not a Party book. It was not written by him as a Party man. The Protestants can be left to argue with him ... As a Catholic I never feel comfortable in the Evangelical Church or its structures. That is why I will have great difficulty if I try to regulate affairs of the Protestant churches. The evangelical people or the Protestants will in any case reject me. But you can be sure: I will protect the rights and freedoms of the churches and not let them be touched, so that you need have no fears about the future of the Church." Hitler

Hitler was also ready to discuss with the Bishop his views on the Jewish question:
"As for the Jews, I am just carrying on with the same policy which the Catholic church has adopted for fifteen hundred years, when it has regarded the Jews as dangerous and pushed them into ghettos etc., because it knew what the Jews were like. I don't put race above religion, but I do see the danger in the representatives of this race for Church and State, and perhaps I am doing Christianity a great service."
J.S. Conway's Nazi Persecution of the Churches

The three big defenders of the Roman Catholic faith were Hitler, Mussolini, and Franco. All three had concordats with the Vatican.

The domain of official politics at universities, parties, newspapers and the TV pulpit is only a section of and as well a façade for the real politics that isn't spread around and consists of precise, well-planned steps of inculturation - blessed by some sort of World Central Committee which I believe is in the hand of the "Jesuses alive" - like "9/11", like American Idol, like the "Litvinenko-Bonding", or the Dollar Meltdown." The government didn't have "failed you" - that's simply how agents work: to mislead other's thinking onto false premises so that the game can be dominated.
That's Dick Clarke's and Dick Cheney's job!

June 3, 2009

follow your bliss

@ 130th min – Mike) One of the things McKenna used to say was that nature loves courage, and the point was, you know, do follow your heart and do not be afraid to do the things that you felt were good, right and true, regardless of what the culture of the society may have indicated, you know, and if you did indeed show courage that nature would reward you, and the reward of nature for you courage is that she removes obstacles and presents doorways that open where you never would have expected them, and presents people and events in your life that allow you to continue.
Joseph Campbell who is another one of my inspirations and just an amazing person. [...] His specialty was mythology, comparative mythology and comparative religion, and he was very well versed on the mythologies of many many many different people over many many ages across this entire planet. And Joe used to talk about a similiar concept of being helped by hidden hands, and he had his own way of saying what Terence said, and of course he said it before Terence, and Terence had his way perhaps of saying what Joe said. Joseph Campbell – one of the things that he is most known for is a simple phrase. That's this one: "Follow your bliss!"
And Joe argued very convincingly actually, and in his own life and work, that if you follow your bliss, well, you know, you will have the same result as if you show courage in the way that Terence described: "Nature loves courage." They were saying the same thing. And Joe always said that if you did that, you would be helped by hidden hands and doors would open, doors of opportunity where you least expected them, and you would been helped by people who you perhaps wouldn't not of imagine being helped by. So, these are the same ideas and the central motive is that you be who you are. You're not be defined by the culture, you're not be defined by the society, you're not be defined by institution and convention. You be who you are. You follow your own path. And you do it with courage, you know. And you follow your bliss.

The big difficulty or one of the many challenges in a culture like ours, in a society like ours, in a time like ours, is how do you even find out what that is: what really gives you bliss, you know. How do you find something that you are willing to be couragous in your persuade of. The path of psychedelics are perhaps, well not perhaps, are certainly one venue, that this can be attempted and very often achieved. The business of shamanism [...] is to help and to heal. The primary function of the shaman is to help and to heal, and to make art. But the first business of anyone – certainly before a person becomes a shaman – they have to take care of their own business.
You know, you cannot help others until you yourself are okay. And this is the fact of the matter! It's about clarity in understanding of situations in a sort of things. So, if you are unclear and confused and giving advice ... you know, I mean, with all the best of intentions, the results were often times not at all pleasent and sometimes catastrophic. What's the old saying? The road to hell is paved with good intentions, right? Well, the thing is, the first of intentions should be: take care of yourself. Heal yourself! Help yourself! Get yourself comfortable and save and secure and honest! Straight about what's really going on in your life and the lifes of those around you.
And once you do that, you know, if that concept of circles that I talk about all the time – your first circle is you! And you square that circle, you get it squared away! You get it straight, keep your own business together. You don't worry about what's happening in the greater world because, frankly, when you are confused and scared and insecure and saturated with propaganda, it's impossible to know! And so for all of us the first challenge I think is to recognize where we are at as individuals, and how we fit into this whole puzzle, and what we can do about our position in it, and how that may effect the greater picture. The circle first goes around you as I say. And then it can be expanded outward, but it happens from inside out, not from outside in. You're not gonna solve the problems of the world by going to Washington and marching on President Bush and whoever else is doing whatever the hell they do there. That's the diversion, right? One of the many. Not that what's going on in Washington doesn't need to be changed, it does! But the way to change it is not by marching on Washington.

The way to change it is by changing yourself. Make yourself into an extraordinary person! Make yourself into a person that nobody else can ignore! Not because of your brutality. Not because of your malice and your pornography. Make yourself extraordinary through good deed and revelation and honesty and truth! And compassion in a way of the shaman, you know, it's available to everybody now. We talked about shamanic technic couple of weeks ago, well, it's available to everybody now. You don't have to be a shaman. You don't have to save the world. But you can utilize the technic and help yourself and your family and your friends and your community and eventually maybe Washington. And it's important to recognize that the methodology ... it's amazing this talk that we just heard from Terence. In 1987! 21 years ago. And it's hysterical because Terence always talked about back then, 20 years ago and further back, about how the psychedelics presented such a grand opportunity because it was immediate! You can get the benefit quickly. And he recognized more than 20 years ago that this was something that had to happen fast. We don't have time, you know, to mess around with things that are going to take decades or centuries to perfect. The path of psychedelics are so profound in the experience of that, that if the right people do it, it could bring about tremendous change very very quickly. There is no question about that. So, you just got a hope that the right people are doing it. And that's one of the reasons why I do the show and talking about this stuff so often is because there are some people out there who are the right people, who should be doing it, and who aren't. And so, one of my charges, one of my responsibilities is to, you know, share this information as it has been shared with me. To try to get the arrow to its mark. And that's what this whole business is about: getting the arrow to its mark!

Me) From a piety-theoretical viewpoint, of course, the question comes in mind why such things as "do follow your own path", "think for yourself", or "wake up" etc. can even play this big role in the public's interest today, when everybody normally thinks of himself as that much of an individual.
There are piety-theoretical aspects all over the place, and the very core of "the conspiracy" also consists of pure piety and uniformity! I think, the post-"9/11" truth movement needs a major shift of its focus on the mysteries of the very blindspot that Richard Grove describes, because by being grounded almost in its entirety on the given conspiracy theatre by professional propagandists such as Jones and Tarpley with their wild and waste New World Order folklore, good enough to entertain the conspiracy-theoretical majority and therewith to generate the well-prepared second main opinion stream beside the plain television mind set, seems to let the movement scrape past the actual key issue which is piety, and not conspiracy. All these issues of highest importance are far more piety-based than a conspiracy like understood in the common sense. Secrecy doesn't actually be our main problem is the point I'm trying to make here. Not what they are hiding but what they are whispering to us is what matters significantly more! Meaning, the whole sphere of public opinion itself, the educational system or the varieties of religious beliefs, for instance, should become major subjects of truthseeking debates. The business of haggling about the entire bandwith of insiders of all sorts must take second place to prudent considerations on principles instead of persons, I believe. The secrecy is just the military feature of the shepherd's fold, nothing more than sheer, definitive brutality. The true art, on the other hand, of that war they are fighting against us all consists of purposely making less-educated and naive ones believe in a proper way, so they can easily be used as servers resp. slaves which includes a lot of subtle and drastic false flag theatre, a lot of psychological terror of confusion, and contempt for mankind in general. Jesuitism as the highly compressed version of Catholicism with its most ruthless and arrogant priesthood of special agents who operate more secretly (Satan) than openly (Santa) being the most effective defenders of the spiritual and therefore political supremacy of the whole Catholic brotherhood and all of their gold, governments, agencies, corporations and institutions of all sorts uses machine-like characteristics of the human soul that are laid out in language, thinking routines and social habits. These are not real democracies we are living in, these are Jesuit (Illuminist, Communist) bureaucracies, what-would-jesus-do neo-theocracies. Absolutist states, so to speak, or just the modern versions of the Roman empire as Eric Phelps characterizes them. Kind of a mafia-style living under a black god-general.

May 31, 2009

idolatry, laity and piety 1

Dennis) And remember how to think! Or just think! I mean, when you see something going on that doesn't make sense, think about it! That's all.
Eric) When you have professionals that don't want to think, it's very hard to having ask the common guy to think, even though they are probably more capable. For example, we have an epidemic of cancer, and yet nobody wants to deal with the causes for that. We have an epidemic of heart desease and don't want to deal with that. So, it's a difficult thing to do but if we want to be free, if we carry with us the responsibility of being able to think for yourself and doing what you need to do.
Dennis) Well, you brought up an interesting term this afternoon, never heard of put quite this way: layman. We have been taught that professionals have to make the laws and the rules and do everything, because we are laymen. And you said – and I never heard it put this way – layman is a term that applies to everything: legal, medical, government. Those in charge know, and the rest of us are laymen, so we don't know.
Eric) That's what they call us. There is no such thing as a layman. It's a ridiculous term. But when you have organized religion, you have a priesthood, and everybody else is the laity. When you have an organized medical profession that's victimizing millions of people every day, you'll have the medical priest, and anybody who studies medicine is a layman. He can't know as much as the doctor, right? It's the same way in law. You have your lawyers and judges, they know it all, but those of us who are not that, we can't possibly know anything about the law, can't we, cause we are just laymen. To be called a layman is to be insulted.
Dennis) Exactly. It doesn't matter, but I wanted to make a point to people out there: We are not laymen at all!

The theory of medicine is completely Jesuitized today.
(John Maynard Keynes – another Jesuit Idol?)

When speaking about loyalty, intended and targeted introduced idolatry, or laymen, for instance, "conspiracy theory" does make its next step forward to serious structural criticism for which I'm putting the question of piety/devoutness into first position asking why somebody wants to believe what he or she believes, thereby dealing with the whole issue of common serfdom to authority. This step appears to me as being absolutely necessary because without it, they can easily keep us cornered in their conspiracy storage siding and nothing will change the Egyptian Shepherd's Fold that we are living under, spiritually and politically literally blindfolded.

From my viewpoint, the phenomena of idolatry and laity perfectly synchronize with Rockefellers "What do you care about them? They are just servers."

Youtube by the way has recently banned (censored) for Germany part 6 (and only part 6!) of an interview with Eric done by Red Ice Creations on September 23, 2007, four days later then published by durian08. The "Hitler-was-a-buffoon" part, you know. Isn't that a kind of ratification somehow?
"He often said, after closing the door: 'My God, what an idiot!'"

@ 14th min – Frank) When you are dealing with understanding the motive of the people you are trying to expose, those people are thinking in terms of hundreds of years, thousands of years. Those people have ... look, the most valuable thing is, they have got over trillion dollars worths of gold in Zürich. That's your gold and my gold. That's not their gold. If you were born in Africa, if you have Afro-American blood than some of that gold is yours, stolen by the Vatican. If you grew up in Europe, or your ancestors grew up in Europe – Ireland, France – than some of that gold is your gold, stolen by the Vatican. But the most valuable thing from the Vatican's perspective isn't gold, cause they've got it all. It's the historical treaties, and genealogical charts, and true history that's locked away in vaults around the world. So when we are trying to understand what's happening in America like the swine flue today, most people who are trying to battle these forces, or trying to expose these forces, have no idea. I talked about the CCR5 anomaly, a natural defect that the ruling families in this world have had nearly three and a half thousand years. They have no idea when we talk about Akhenaten and the () to cyanide that this is a real historical fact. It's real, it's not myth. So, the problem I think people face in America today, in particular the truth movement in America, is that we are not dealing with the same understanding as the people we are trying to expose. And that's why so many people are easily beguiled and throwing off course. From the likes of people like Alex Jones, a paid propagandist. They are the sort of people that easily switch tens of thousands of peoples off therein a blind alley to talk about UFOs when really they should talk about who is behind the swine flue, who is behind pulling the plug on the American economy. So I think, the difficulty for Americans today is this challenge of what is the real history, who is really behind this, and how can I find real proof. Not just accusations, supposition and misdirection.

Greg) That to me is the key issue here. If we are not given all the facts in history, how can we then simulate what's going on today and put it in a proper perspective! That's why shows like this are important because we can add some things and maybe that will help us get to at least an understanding of what's going on and not be let down these rabbit holes like you said by misinformation artists like Alex Jones. [...] What are some other things that we need to look at, that we may have missed? And I think, you cover a lot of this on your website ...
Frank) I would ask anyone listening, and to refer this on, to go and have a look on [...] Francis of Assisi, the greatest saint of the Roman Cult. Go and have a look because if you want to understand what people have missed, the truth, is understanding who Francis of Assisi was.

@ 28th min – Greg) Okay, we're back, all the technical difficulties behind us, my guest is Fank O'Collins, author of The Almanac of Evil. You will get his writings on one-evil.org. When you go there, there is so much information. Frank, where do you recommend people start? That's an interesting question because I have gone to your website and I found ... the thing I found most fascinating, and this stimulated a lot of research on my part, and I wanted to thank you, was this connection between father Edmund Walsh, Stalin, and Eisenhower, and Roosevelt, and it gave me a real basis to look into many many things. I did find an interesting speech by Eisenhower after Edmund Walsh died. And it was amazing: without the added information about the behind the scenes of this Jesuit, I would have never understood why they would take this basically educator from Georgetown and elevate him to a status of honor, where an American president honored him in a huge speech. And you can get that on Eisenhower's own website, you know, the presidential website. Quite interesting, isn't it, Frank?
Frank) Well, it is, and I think the answer is, people that are prepared to learn again to have their own interests. It might be from the background, their family history, what they'd like to find out. So people who come from different places, for example, a pastor or someone that may listen or hear of this show, maybe interested to understand the basis behind the whole Reformation and Counter-Reformation, and why in particular for England the Counter-Reformation was so ruthless and vicious. It's until you read, for example, you go on and again look under people, and you go through the 12th century there, when you look at King John of England [...] actually giving up the ownership of England and Ireland to Pope Innocent through a bull called the Golden Bull. It's not to be seen as historic act to realize that when the Vatican went in there, and the Counter-Reformation, and the Jesuits, it was based on to get their property back. [...] But some of the real gems is the use of research I'm putting up there now on people, on bloodlines, on entities, and how it all connects. And I'm really hoping that, like you said, it will spark peoples' interest to understand the motive and the knowledge that these people already have in regard as their most precious treasure.

Greg) When you are trying to understand this story, there comes a point where you reach ... you can't fall into complacency because you say, where else can I go. There is a lot of places to go. And I'll tell you, it's only the beginning, what we are uncovering on this show, of what really happened throughout the ages. Because, you know, it's hard enough to figure out what happened yesterday if you try to reconstruct a crime scene. Just think about going back a thousand years! And I hope that there is something in this story that we bring on this show, which is really a story that I can synthecize down to who controls the New World Order, who is behind it, and the religious and political aspects of it, and how far back does it go. And, in a sence, is the Vatican right now involved in taking back, like you said, the property as they went into England and Ireland to take back what they thought was their property? Are they doing the same thing here in America? My answer to that is, I think, all you need to do is start researching from the point of view you talked about in Ireland and England and see the connections of the Vatican to the formations of our country, and perhaps it's the same modus operandi just in a different manner. What do you think?

Frank) Well, that's right, and I mean, when an American today is concerned for the future of their family and the swine flue, a disease that defies the natural laws of evolution. And I think, people need to understand that. Diseases mutate, but this is the first time that I have heard of a mutating virus being swine flue has combined with a mutating virus being the bird flue to also have the human gens to become a mutating virus of the human. Those three kind of mutating histories to come together and land in Mexico, a country under siege because of its antagonism towards the Vatican ... I mean, the war on drugs and the war of drugs in Mexico is nothing more than the same playbook that was used in southern Italy to break up the first attempt to create Italy as a country, when the Vatican went to its old friend and said, come, build us a network of mercenaries again, in the 19th century, and we know them as the Cosa Nostra, the Mafia. They meet every year in Rome. [...] They still operating. They are the vessels of the pope. So, when people with the swine flue ... they don't unterstand the mindset for this, the motive for this, the history of this. It's all very practical from these peoples' point of view. They don't get emotional about it, we get emotional about it, because we don't want to see millions of peoples die. From their perspective it's just business! And if you don't sign the document, we are gonna kill a few more people!
How simple is that!
So, that's what you're dealing with. You're dealing with people that () and self-fear. Fear is the no. 1 biggest selling product, and they got the market cornered.

And until people understand history, and they are dealing with unknowns, then fear like cement fill within the gaps. So, what I'm trying to do is give people the tools to really play on the same field as they do, and not be fearful, and understand their motives, and understand why. Because in understanding why, you see some hilarious stuff! I mean that quite sincerely, you discover the absurdity of the Chair of St. Peter in the Vatican itself, set up there like a throne, and realize that they went through, well, over a dozen of those. And that the Chair of St Peter is legally supposed to be the original chair. And if its not the original chair, then legally infallibility, ex cathedra, the whole concept in speaking of Chair of St. Peter is an illegal act. It means that all this infallibility debate and all these claims and bulls from the Catholic Church by their own laws are illegal. So when people that see and hopefully learn this ... look, when people start to read and understand the history, they see that ... look, attacking the Vatican, and scream them off, and getting them basically to back in the box, and stop hurting the world – there is so many opportunities to have a goal with them. And it's not just about pedophilia and child molestation. I mean, it goes from everything down to, as I said, I mean, the Chair of St. Peter, the fraud that is the Donation of Constantine, all these things can be used against them. But if people, particular who say they are Christians, that they are Reformers, that they are anti-Papists, if they don't use the evidence that's there, the truth that's there, then they are going in unarmed, half-armed. And they are not going to really find any effective solution to this.

Greg) Good point, and I mean, once you start looking at some of the basic frauds that they have been able to pass off over the centuries – this is not just something that's happened in the 20th century – take for example papal infallibility. That is relatively new. When you really research it, you find, it only came into being in 1870 by a maniac pope. And I use that term not from my perspective but from his own cardinals who called him insane. And so you see that, when you speak of the pope, when you talk to people and you say something against him, they look at you as if you are talking against God on earth. And that needs to be really wiped away. The Bible doesn't talk about it. When you understand the political aspects of this, papal infallibility, the message that they pass, it's nothing but a big lie, and that needs to be exposed. [...] They use religion as a cover. Now, for example, one of the great frauds has been the Apparitions of the Mother Mary. If you look closely, this is nothing new. What about the Apparition of the Mother of Guadaloupe. Mary came there down in 1531 according to them. Interesting that she did just at the time when the Protestant Reformation was taking a big hold and taking a little bit of their property and money away, right Frank?

Frank) Absolutely. Look, example: – and I'm gonna update the website () but the history is there – understanding the Holy See as a corporate entity. A business venture, a joint business venture. And secondly understanding that the legality of that corporation, the charta under which it forms, and operates, and survives, rests on "pillars of salt", rests on sand. It rests on things like apostalic succession. A technical and a very dry argument but nonetheless a crucial legal argument that is: if Pope Benedict can be proven not to be in succession, the successor through historical popes back to St. Peter, then the pope does not represent Christians, the pope is not the representative of St. Peter, and the Holy See is not legally an effective corporation. It is like someone going to court and winding it up. If you can proof that and take that to court, then the Holy See is no longer a legitimate corporation. Now, I find it incredible today that England under Brown is still prepared to watch that country being sliced to pieces and do nothing against the Vatican. I find it extraordinary in America that people are losing homes, life and hope, and America does absolutely nothing against Zürich knowing what Zürich did, to start this from a credit crime ()() of bad loans into a global meltdown. So, I'm hoping that listeners and people I talk to at least start to look at this and go to one-evil.org, and see the facts that have been aright and corrected, because all it takes is one good rock! Just ask King David!

@ 42th min – Greg) The Madoff scandal makes huge news, and then, for example, there is a law suit right now going on in one of our southern states, I believe in Mississippi, where eight insurance commissioners from eight states have gotten together to sue the Holy See for insurance fraud in the billions of dollars. It's huge! Money taken out of American people's pockets through the Holy See, and the story doesn't even get a headline! This is bigger than Madoff but it doesn't get a headline! Why? It shows you the control!
Frank) Because the greatest evil in the world today are the people you watch on the six o'clock news and the faceless people that sit behind their bar line in the rapidly bankrupting newspapers of major cities in America and around the world. People who are self-assured in their intellect who consider all that we speak of as some horrible diversion/delusion, that we are delusional people, that when they get close to the truth, the more unhappy to take that new car, that new job, that new trip, and keep us all as mushrooms. [Einspruch!!] When you have got an intellectual class of people in this world that are more than happy to take these "thirty pieces of silver" and never stand up – unlike the journalist who are prepared to die in Russia to tell the truth about Chechnya [as Gary Webb was as well] – that's the evil that keeps it under it. It's not the politicians. No one should believe that politicians could ever possibly tell the truth. It's just not possible in politics. Nor should I feel that the people behind this who actually do this, the Vatican, are hardly to blame. I can proof to you that these people for the last thousand years have been in business with evil, and look, they haven't changed. What has changed in the last 60 years is that intellectual class, the journalists and the media owners that even today refuse to tell the truth. [...]

And every year, Adolf Hitler is honored. Every year, and not one media outlet – its about all these films on the Nazis – is prepared to even put one paragraph about this agreement ("After 25 years of intense research, padre Peter Gumpel SJ is convinced that Pope Pius XII has deserved it to be canonized."), this incredibly evil act that is right in front of every single eye for the last 60 years. [...] The truth is that the same class of people, [...] I mean that sincerely: The most evil people that I have found, the most cowardly people, the ones that have no spine, our traitors, are the intellectual class [...] the journalists of the world, that are more than happy to take their pie and be self-centered.
And the thing about Murdoch is, Murdoch saw that many of these media outlets are quite comfortable and lazy about [...] they saw an opportunity to turn news into entertainment, he came up with the idea, and that's why they backed him, of turning news from being censored to being entertainment. The once Murdoch sold them the idea, that let's not just censor news and not tell people the truth about the Reichskonkordat, about the 300-mile wide Pentagram, let's turn it into entertainment, they loved him, and that's why he succeded. He is the great entertainer.

Greg) Good point! I didn't think of it in those terms but that's a great way, and you can see what his outlets have turned news into: basically just entertainment. Making it kind of subsidiary of Hollywood, so to speak, so that everything becomes a phantasy, even though it's presented on the news. And if there's any truth, those people are the crazy ones, right? "The ones who are really fundamentalist, really off the wall, you have got to listen to us, our entertaining story first." And that was quite evident in Fox's news coverage of "9/11" if you look back on those early days. They told you a lot of things but I'll tell you what: it served their purposes better than it served truth tellers who really wanted to get to the truth about who caused that event, and I looked at it as, you know, Americans looked at it as, you know, just another escalation of violence of a terrorist group, but they didn't really understand where this terrorist group was formed. And I always said, even the truth tellers who said, "well, the government is involved in this" and they can proof it beyond a reasonable doubt – that's just the first layer, that the layers go so deep that it will go right to, again, right to Rome.

"There is something in this story," Greg, at least for me.
When nearly all internet researchers on all levels call more or less passionately for "waking people up" and "thinking by yourself", "detecting the illusions" and so forth by seeing the world from a new and furthermore changing increasingly more own perspective, I want to make from now on exactly this area of blatant public helplessness and kind of blind-alley self-interrogation resp. appeal to others to the absolute overarching, major subject of my (9/11 Truth) online adventures: mind control per every thinkable sort of piety/devoutness with the Jesus-like Professes SJ as the world champions on this discipline.
The aspect of devoutness beats the aspect of conspiracy by far! Making somebody believe is significantly more important compared to keeping something secret from him. And you can see it, because they are operating quite openly in broad daylight: Ray McGovern (SJ), Michael Scheuer (SJ).
"Il n'y a pas d'assujetissement si parfait que celui qui garde l'apparence de la liberté.
On captive ainsi la volonté même" Jean-Jacques Rousseau in Émile
"Keine Unterwerfung ist so perfekt wie die, die den Anschein der Freiheit bewahrt.
Damit lässt sich selbst der Wille gefangen nehmen."
"No subjection is that perfect than the one that keeps up a pretence of freedom.
Therewith even the will lets itself take into custody."
9/11 is foremost a matter of piety, not of conspiracy!

May 25, 2009

full-blown fascist colony, there is a basis

@ 28th min) I want to take a moment here to thank everybody who listens to my show. You're always welcomed to turn this radio on in the morning and listen, and tell your friends, tell your relatives, tell everyone to catch the Investigative Journal at 9 AM Central, Monday through Friday. It may just give you an impetus to look into things that you normally don't, and that's why I do this show. And also listen to Tom Freiss' show right after mine that's called The Inquisition Update. I love the way he's titled this show because that's what we're under here in this country. And we explain it, I believe, quite well, better than any radio station on this planet. And those other people that do the same thing like Eric Phelps. Nicklas Arthur comes on in the morning and talks about the Bible and things that are very important – I've learned so much from his show. So please, please, don't forget Liberty Radio! Donate to his cause! He spends many many hours, that's Nicklas, the owner of this station, trying to bring this message. It's not an easy one. It's probably the most difficult one in this country to bring, but hopefully people will listen.

Now, there's gonna be a change a little bit in my show, not the time of me being on, but just the way I feel about the people I bring on my show. If you go back to my old shows, you'll see that I covered a wide range of topics. Everything from Chemtrails to 9/11, you name it, I tried to cover it and bring people on. Then as I began to horn in on the problem with the Vatican, I concentrated for years on this subject and said I would never stop. I never will. But it's time to bring people on again. It's time again to go back and bring these people on. Some of the people that I had in the past, that talked about Chemtrails, some of the people that didn't quite make the connection between the Vatican and what we're doing. But it's all involved. The Vatican is behind most of the things we talk about here, if not all. 9/11, the Chemtrails, the stuff in your food, the FDA. And there are so many people that I've brought on, that understood it, many they didn't. Many that I brought on were also agents of the Vatican. I learned that the hard way. But it was a learning process, and I'm not afraid to bring them on again. Because this time, maybe I know a little bit more. And through what I've learned to the people on this show that were really enlighten me through the word of God, I can bring it on if they can not mention it, this connection, I will. And perhaps together we can again expose the Vatican for what they really are: a bunch of criminals who are hiding behind and using the word of God to lie to people. They have many shills, they have shills all over – I can name a hundred right now. But guess who their main one is. It's Jesus Christ. And that's what makes them the Abomination of the Earth, the whore that rides, you know who they are, and we try to expose that here. So in the weeks that come, it will take a little while to find some of these people that I used to interview. It may takes some time to get more people on, talk about other issues, but I plan to do that, it's time again.

And I feel inspired to do that because there are so many problems, and I believe now, some of the things that I didn't say then, when I had people on, oh like Ray McGovern if he has the guts to come on my show again. Cause he was trained by a Jesuit, and he said that he was trying to get to the truth about the – remember – the weapons of mass destruction. Well, let's ask Mr. McGovern next time what his allegiance is to Georgetown, what his allegiance is, and what his church is all about. He told me, he was a minister or something up there on some new church in Washington. Let's find out because back then I was courteous enough not so say anything. But I feel obligated now to talk about it. And perhaps we can understand even more. So I wanna take this opportunity and maybe take that step into the unknown with some of these people who whether I know they are Jesuit agents, or whether I don't, but somehow seem to forget about this subject, and bring them back on and see what they have to say now. And I just wondered if you thought that would be interesting. If you're listening and you have any comments about what I just said, you can email me at (gregbeacon)AT(gmail)DOT(com) and I'll respond, or you can call me at 559-781-3883, and we can talk about this. And another thing I want to talk about is, you know, Tony Alamo sits in the jail, and the Alamo ministry sits in the jail but I see very little support in the patriot community for him save this show and a couple of others like Tom Freiss' show. Why? It's a good question. Maybe we can get to the bottom of that by simply asking people. And I will say it too: I made a mistake during a number of years in my early broadcasts by trying to be too politically correct but not asking the tough questions, by basically giving the guest the benefit of the doubt, but I don't want to do that any longer. So I'm gonna make it perfectly clear to many of the people that were on my show in the past and the new people I look for, that are dealing with these subjects of 9/11, Waco, all the ... I want to make it clear to them when they come on that I'm gonna deal with this issue, and you want to talk about it. And if they don't, I'll tell you why they didn't come on the show, and then you can email them. But I don't think we need to hide any longer, I don't think we need to be politically correct about these issues any longer. I think it's time, at least in my mind, to open this show up a little bit more again. I like I used to. But to do it with a little bit more of wisdom that I didn't have before. And hopefully, hopefully it will open the minds and hearts of more people. I know some people are at a point in their life, they can't listen to this, and they turned me off for this reason. I don't want to turn these people away any longer, I feel an obligation to speak with them. And so perhaps I can speak with them through topics of their interest and show them the connection between the perpetrators that we talk about today and even what's going on in your sky, even in the food we eat. There is a basis for this. [...]

@ 36 th min) You know what he said? He said, "to all my critics (including me), when you do as much good works as I've done to help my fellow man, then you, you know, are the ones that need to be criticized. So what was he doing? I brought it out in my show: he was relating salvation to works which is exactly what the Jesuits do when in fact it has nothing to do with that. Salvation has to do with grace, and has to do with the word of God. Has nothing to do with the supposed good that Mr. Horowitz said he's doing, that his detractors aren't doing, and evaluating us on those terms, which is exactly how you were valuated when you were a young Catholic. But never is there a mention in the Bible, never is there a mention of these secret societies, never is there a mention of the corruption within the Vatican, the corruption within these groups like the Knights of Hospitaller and the Knights of Malta – they're all one and the same when you do your research. So again, maybe we should have Dr. Horowitz on to explain it, he has the guts. Maybe we should have Alex Jones on again and explain what he does, but he won't come on. He hides behind his own show and lies to you. Maybe we should have all these people on again. Let me know what you think! I thought it was a waste of time but maybe it isn't, because there is a time and a place for everything. And it's about time that we alert people who first come to the internet of what these people are all about and what we've learned about it. Maybe I do feel an obligation because of my personal experience with those organizations finding out the hard way exactly what they're all about. So we'll get to this in later shows. Let me know how you think about that! And I will continue. So, I was in the middle of a very important conversation ...

Me) Allright. That was great! I could give you some names.
My three favorites for investigative interviews were Richard Grove, Eric Shine (more recently – sometime someone ought to put him straight on the plain fact that aristocrat families would be nothing without their quasi-godlike status for which always others were in charge: the champions of interpretation secretly as well as openly ruling over the mysteries in the world, the priesthood), and of course, I'm still interested in a personal commentary by Walter Burien on the today's long-planned global financial crisis.

Steven Hairfield would be magnificient! Theologian David Ray Griffin was certainly interesting, and, I think, also doable without much preparation. Not so with Mr. Tarpley "No one can out-talk" him. Well, Eric could, couldn't he. Maybe I had some good first beginnings about Webster, our famous conspiracy master and immense gatekeeper never considering the church, but that's an operation of its own for a couple of months that come. Both Griffin and Tarpley have already been given interviews or lectures along with William Engdahl and others as invited guests at a Swiss online diarist who I call the "Alpin Alex Jones", Mr. Sound & Smoke ("all hollow words").
Alex Jones doesn't make any structural demands at all. Like I said, he's just a big instantaneous water heater, a loud and lying cheap-Jack for every sort of conspiracy stuff. He never wanted to achieve a piece of coherent information, not to speak of efforts for systematic descriptions. I don't even know how to take him seriously anymore! Somehow he squelches everything together, digests it, and what remains then is ... I rather won't say it. 7 years after 9/11, he still speaks of "those Jesuits" if they were totally unreal gestalts who simply don't make it to arouse his interest.

Do you remember Brian David Andersen?
("On May 14, 2008, an historic and pivotal event took place")

He was a very precise conversational partner with deep insights:
@ 17th min – Greg) "This war would never have been possible without the sinister influence of the Jesuits. We owe it to Popery that we now see our land reddened with the blood of her noblest sons. [...] I pity the priests, the bishops and the monks of Rome in the United States, when the people realize that they are, in great part, responsible for the tears and the blood shed in this war. The later the more terrible will the retribution be. I conceal what I know, on that subject, from the knowledge of the nation. For if the people knew the whole truth, this war would turn into a religious war, and it would, at once, take a tenfold more savage and bloody character, it would become merciless as all religious wars are. It would become a war of extermination on both sides.
The Protestants of both the North and the South would surely unite to exterminate the priests and the Jesuits, if they could hear what Professor Morse has said to me of the plots made in the very city of Rome to destroy this Republic, and if they could learn how the priests, the nuns, and the monks, which daily land on our shores, under the pretext of preaching their religion, instructing the people in their schools, taking care of the sick in the hospitals, are nothing else but the emissaries of the Pope, of Napoleon, and the other despots of Europe, to undermine our institutions, alienate the hearts of our people from our constitution, and our laws, destroy our schools, and prepare a reign of anarchy here as they have done in Ireland, in Mexico, in Spain, and wherever there are any people who want to be free."

@ 44 th min – Greg) Now take for example Ray McGovern. He ist Fordham trained, Jesuit trained, CIA analyst. He runs an ecumenical church in Washington DC that's supposedly unifying all religions together which tells me there, that's the Jesuit idea to get everybody secretly under the control of the pope, and then at times he blames the Jewish lobby for our problems. Outspoken critic of Bush and Cheney but will not people word out about the Vatican! So that tells me, there is a problem. […] And also the Point B: Can it be possible, a man of this education doesn't know? I find that hard to believe.

@ 48th min – Brian) Don't go into the polarities because that's exactly where they want you. […] When you are not going into the polarity, you're not in their plan.

@ 52th min – Greg) Here is the point: if we openly talk about this, if we ask the right questions to guys like Tarpley … Ask him, why he doesn't emphasize the Vatican-led New World Order!
Brian) That's exactly what I saw on Deagle's Show today. I mean, here is a guy who is higly connected through his education, and he makes this blatant statement on the Deagle Show, he said: "oh … there is no … oh … central … conspiracy, this is all just fragmented, types of monster fighting on another."
Why must Blair became a Roman Catholic, and why is he now running for European president? Why is the EU in its documents saying that it's Catholic dominated?

@ 55th min – Brian) As soon you start talking about The Facts & The Evidence, they shut you down. Or just totally ignore. "No message is more important and critical than the exposure of the Jesuits and the Vatican as the originators and architects of the New World Order. The Jesuits and the Vatican desire to put all humans under a police state while forcing you, me and everyone else to worship the Pope."

Me again) Therefore I think, the legendary David J. Smith has deserved an appearance as investigator on The Beacon, and so has perhaps Naomi Wolf. Among other things, she did a conversation with Viet Dinh in person directly at Georgetown University, which even has been shown on Youtube for a while. Her Clinton background could possibly become an exciting subject for deeper exploration. Furthermore, I would find dialogues with men like Jean Ziegler or Richard Rohr very useful.

From his book @ p. 25) "Purpose of the spiritual exercises is to find ways into Christian freedom. This will be enabled by a figural relationship to Jesus in which we are capable of hearing Christ's calling and becoming ready to go into his commission. The enneagram is an allied and, in some respect, even more precise tool to achieve this objective. That's one of the reasons why a row of Masters of Spiritual Exercises has begun to also employ the enneagram besides the traditional Ignatian exercises. [...]
Christus represents God and thereby the essence of the world, the true being. At the same time, however, he was a real human being who has abided the conditions of the existence with its threats, temptations and abysms: 'For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities, but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.' (Hebrews 4: 15) Hereafter, when we speak of the enneagram as the icon of Christ's face, we are interpreting it as 'the face of God', and likewise as 'the face of the (true) human being'."

Hiram said it: "They utilize anything & everybody to bring their means to an end."

In one of your broadcasts in January or February, you made the offer to high-ranking Catholics to come on the show – exactly what's been needed! But above all, we need one or a few fair researchers who are strongly convinced of the "Jewish World Conspiracy" and ready to honestly debate the main issues in public. I believe, that's the most important thing anyway, right now. And, you know, "there is a basis for this".

May 18, 2009

they will do anything, there is no limit

@ 55th min) Treason from one end of the spectrum to the next, all controlled by the Vatican […] in putting the Chinese people under a Chinese inquisition, so that the land owners could be killed, so that any middle class could be killed, so that anybody who had any wealth could be killed […] It was the CIA that brought up the Dalai Lama in 1959 out of Tibet, so Mao TseTung could take his Chinese lords, and begin to kill the Tibetans, and carry out an inquisition with his Red Army.
All of this is a Jesuit inquisition, no matter what you wanna call it. All controlled by Rome through the American Council on Foreign Relations which is controlled by the Archbishop of New York, for which reason John Paul II said that Cardinal O'Connor was the "Archbishop of the Capital of the World". New York City is the Fort of all political power in the earth as controlled by the Vatican, London is the economic colossus, and Rome is the religious centre. And through those three centres the Jesuits control all academia, all the monies, all the religions, all the politics that are presently in the world today, specifically in the Western hemisphere.
So, this is the Jesuit inquisition that they have launched: we reviewed Russia, we reviewed China, we reviewed someone in Europe, we reviewed in Italy …

@ 64th min) Here is another quote: "We [the Popes] hold upon this earth the place of God Almighty." Who said this? Pope Leo XIII, 1894: Encyclical Letter in June 20, 1894. And it's this very same Pope Leo XIII who succeeded Pope Pius IX. It's this very same Leo XIII who had a cardinal secretary who's name was Mariano Rampolla del Tindaro who was according to Craig Heimbichner in the Blood on the Altar a member of the O.T.O., that's right. Cardinal Secretary to the Pope, the second most powerful in the Papacy was a member of the O.T.O. just like Aleister Crowley. No wonder Satan sits in the Vatican.

Look further, here is another quote: "I am the pope. I am king over all. I am God on earth. When I speak, my word is the word of God, and you are to remember this as long as you live." Who said this? Pope Pius XI in 1924. This is 1924. This year my father was born. This isn't too distant for me. 1924, speaking to schoolchildren at the Vatican – the book is "Alien Rome". I read that again: [...] Now what is that have to say for inner religious dialogue? It's a farce! Anybody negotiating for the Papacy is negotiating for a man who claims to be "God on earth, King over all". He can not be trialed, he can not be charged with heresy, he can not be charged as a criminal, and prosecuted and punished. This guy claims he has the right to rule the world, and for which reason there is no other man on earth who is allowed to claim the title or the rights of deity. [...] the same time in World War II removing anybody else who claims to be God on earth like Hirohito – one of the reasons for the unconditional surrender that the Pope's CFR-controlled American Government resisted upon. This is why Hirohito would be humiliated, and so he would never be deemed as God among the Japanese. He is just now a political figure. Before that, Hirohito or the emperor of Japan offends () for thousand years! The Japanese regarded him as God manifested in the flesh – there is only one man who regard manifested in flesh: that's the Pope.

That's why this is a war against the Shiite Muslims primarily, because the leader of the Shiite Muslims, their caliph, their imam, he claims their traits of deity. That he's infallible. Whereas the Sunni had caliph, the Sunni had imam – he doesn't claim that. So the Sunnis are not in war with the papacy, and that's why the Sunnis are meeting with the Vatican! And the Wahhabis:
"What connection, if any, there is between Wahhabism and Jihadi Salafis is disputed. Among others, Daniel Pipes claims there is 'a direct line between the Wahhabis and Osama bin Laden'. However, Natana De Long-Bas, senior research assistant at the Prince Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown University, argues: 'The militant Islam of Osama bin Laden does not have its origins in the teachings of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab and is not representative of Wahhabi Islam as it is practiced in contemporary Saudi Arabia, yet for the media it has come to define Wahhabi Islam in the contemporary era. However "unrepresentative" bin Laden's global jihad is of Islam in general and Wahhabi Islam in particular, its prominence in headline news has taken Wahhabi Islam across the spectrum from revival and reform to global jihad.'"
And not the Shiites, not the religious Shiites, they are not meeting, are they. No, the pope is "king over all", he is "God on earth".

Now, here is a response of a real Protestant to this claim: "I refuse the pope as Christ's enemy and Antichrist with all his false doctrine."
That is Protestantism. That is what a true Baptist believes. And you don't find very many of them today. You don't find any Protestants today, cause they're all a bunch of prostitutes. They are prostitute Protestants. They are National Council of Churches Protestants. They are World Council of Churches Protestants. They are all Masonic. They are fraternizing with the whore of Rome. They are just prostitute Protestants, and they're worthless. And you know what? All their churches are going to be destroyed in this country. They were destroyed in apostate Protestant Germany, why wouldn't they be destroyed here? It's all in the making. And all of these apostate Protestants uniting with Rome, and these Evangelicals to fight this crusade of the pope! If we really had any Protestantism in this country, any real bible believers that were hearing to the Reformation Bible, they would say we are not fighting this crusade. We are not going. We will go to jail first.
All the officers who know the Lord will safe us, we will not fighting a papal crusade. We will fight in defence of our country. We will fight in defence of our borders. We will fight in defence of our constitution against all enemies domestic. We will not go half way around the world and fight a war for the benefit of the papacy, so we can bleed and die, or be maimed and broke, and come back here enough be treated ... And what to be the hospital? Letting those soldiers of suffer without treatment. What a disgrace! The whole thing fires me up. [...] All goes back to this damnable doctrine of who the pope thinks he is, and why he can tell you what to do. [...] So we don't have to pay The Pope's Income Tax anymore! And that's all it is. I show in my book Vatican Assassins that the papacy laid upon the nobles and the priests of Europe an income tax to finance the crusades. And they're doing the same thing now! Nothing has changed.

@ 78th min) I'll read that again. "You will not find one of these conspiracies that chief of which after years of care has been able to organize his forces with so little danger, with as great advantages as the General of the Jesuits can command within 24 hours." My friends, there is not one of you that the Jesuit General Adolfo Nicolás ... that he cannot fully know everything about you within 24 hours. He knows your weaknesses, he knows your strengths. He controls the CIA, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, the Defence Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency – all of that is controlled by the General of the Jesuits. All he needs to do is punching your name, and all his servants there and all those agencies get your socialist insecurity number, and they can carve up everything about you. Get all you credit cards, whatever you spend your money on, whatever you do, they can know everything about you within 24 hours. And if they want to attack you they don't write you where to attack you – they know your weakness, they know your strength. There is nothing they don't know about you, so forget hiding from them! They already know. You wanna face them boldly as a man with the sword of the word of God in your hand. With this thing then, and ultimately with this sword of just defence when that day arrives, which will be the gun in defence of our lives, and our fortunes, and our sacred honor after () state succeeds. Yeah, we keep that: every American state succeeds, every one of them. Every Canadian province needs to succeed. We just () national sovereignties once again, and then unite in certain confederations that are limited in their powers, specifically against this great sinister secret society.

Here's another quote: "It is true that, despite all their efforts, […] they [the Jesuits] have been unable to achieve their great aim, that of founding a Universal Roman Kingdom."
Listen to that! What's their great aim? That of founding a Universal Roman Kingdom, a world government under a pope of Rome. That's their design. "Nevertheless it is they who have, with all their skill, all their zeal and all their worldly wisdom, upheld [the Temporal Power of] the secular papacy against every hostile influence." (René Fulop-Miller in The Power and Secret of the Jesuits, 1930) That's right: the Jesuits are the Obsidian Order. They are the pope's Praetorian Guard. The papacy cannot stand, it cannot last without the Jesuit Order. It is vulnerable if the Jesuits do not exist. And there has only been one time when the papacy was ever really humiliated from 606 until now, and that is when the Jesuits were suppressed by the pope. That's when they were formally suppressed and distinguished forever with a papal bull by Pope Clement XIII in 1773. So the Jesuits, what did they do? […] They go underground. They never ceased to exist. Jesuit general Ricci said, no one can release them from their vows. So they went underground. And do you know what they formed? They formed the Bavarian Illuminati. They started another order, a few other orders that they can hide underneath. They were once backing the Jacobins, the revolutionaries in France. [...] Robespierre was trained by Jesuits in the college of Lycée Louis-le-Grand (alumni="illuminated ones") in Paris. He was there student – after they used him, they killed him. And they brought Napoleon in power. And I'll cover sometime what Napoleon did to the great black leader Toussaint of Haiti. How Napoleon betrayed him ...

Adolph Freiherr Knigge was a well-known, high-degree Freemason, a member of the Bavarian Illuminati as probably the most famous front group for the Jesuit Order besides the Bilderbergers, the Opus Dei, or the Club of Rome, and he was a German Jacobin too. And that's already all in Wikipedia!

"During the Order's Suppression from 1773 to 1814 by Pope Clement XIV, General Ricci created the Order of the Illuminati with his soldier, AdamWeishaupt, uniting the House of Rothschild with the Society of Jesus. Weishaupt, the Father of modern Communism, used his bloody Jacobins to conduct the French Revolution incited by his Masonic Encyclopaedists, Voltaire and Diderot. Years later Jesuit General Ledochowski, with his Bolsheviks, conducted the Russian Revolution in 1917 incited by his Masonic Communists, Marx and Engels, it being identical to the upheaval of 1789. What many modern writers of today describe as "the Illuminati" is, in fact and purpose, another name for the Jesuit Order under the allpervading guidance of its master governing Washington, D.C., London, Paris, Moscow, Peking, Jerusalem, Mecca and the Vatican, the Black Pope." Vatican Assassins, Pause II
"In addition to France's expulsion of the Order in 1764 and now her aid to the accursed American "heretics and liberals", the rage of the Jesuits would unleash the French Revolution. They would use Robespierre, brainwashed by Jesuits for nine years in their College of Louis-le-grand, to lead the Jacobins." Vatican Assassins, Chapter 17

@ 91th min) He is the absolute counselor of your conscience. So when the pope or one of his agents, the priest, tells you to do something, it's coming from God. Therefore, if a priest tells you that your president has to be removed, and if you do this, it is no murder to kill this man, you're gonna do it. Do you see how these satanic doctrines () and discord in any political state? No free country can survive with this circulating among his population. If these people believe, if these priests have the power, when all the catholic people or others believe, that these men have the power to forgive them their sins ... that they have this special power, they will do anything! There is no limit what they will do!

May 4, 2009

obedience & opportunism 1

The book details the betrayal of Israel's leadership during the Holocaust, recalling that Rudolph Kastner, 'then one of Israel's most honored leaders, was a traitor who had cooperated with the Nazi leaders of Germany including Adolph Eichmann to deport Jews from Hungary.'
I don't dispute this claim and anyone who does should read Ben Hecht's Perfidy or The Transfer Agreement by Edwin Black. It is the conclusion drawn from this treason, on page 584, which is far more troublesome:
'Ah, dear truth seeker, Zionist Israel is a creation of the Jesuit Order. Its purpose is to secure Jerusalem for the Jesuits 'infallible' Pope, that he may receive worldwide worship from Solomon's rebuilt Temple. If the Masonic Zionists betrayed their own Jewish race into Pius XII's concentration camps overseen by the Jesuit Order, would they not betray the nation of Israel by giving Jerusalem to the Pope in preparation for the rebuilding of Solomon's Temple? [...] Therefore we are living under the preeminence of a Gentile Jesuit conspiracy. It employs notorious Masonic Jews and Gentiles as their agents. This furthers the deception of an international Jewish conspiracy oppressing the nations. Using this lie, the Jesuit General in creating global, anti-Jewish fury again. This fury will culminate in the last mad attempt to invade Israel and destroy the physical descendants of Jacob.'

And who is leading the invasion?
We learn that Bill Clinton was the student president of the Jesuit's Georgetown University and, for a time, expressed the desire of becoming a Jesuit priest. In those days, Clinton was sent to England on a Rhodes scholarship, with all that that implies, and at an anti-American demonstration met Jesuit Friar Richard McSorely, who later headed Georgetown's Center For Peace Studies. On page 672, we get a haunting hint at Clinton's later role in Israel's destruction, as well as those of Norway and France: 'McSorley then went to France and Scandinavia to meet peace people. Stepping off the train right behind him in Oslo, Norway was Bill Clinton.'
And if a Clinton Democrat fails to ignite the flames that will engulf Israel, the Jesuits, 'will use the Republican Party to bring a Jesuit-controlled, Jew-hating fascist dictator to power, 'For the greater glory of the god who sits in St. Peter's chair.'' That's Eric Jon Phelps' explanation why Israel's political leaders, especially those of the Labor Party, are running between, Chirac, King Carlos and the Vatican to secure a 'peace' treaty with the PLO.
I can only advise my readers not to dismiss the possibility that he got it right.

Anonym: "From the early days of the New Age movement, Catholics and Jews have been major targets because they are organized and can't easily be co-opted by a system that wants to change things. The New Age establishment was in worldwide operation as the Nazis were coming to power. Many New Age promoting writers were selling the same agenda as the Nazis, and based on my search of the name, Rene Fulop-Miller, author of the book named by Terry, and other books written by him, he was of that ilk. The Oh Wow gossip factor sells books such as that by Phelps, not a desire to learn about a subject. To show how neutral you are Terry, why don't you suggest a book written by Jesuits themselves on their history."

Terry Melanson: "About Barry: he is above all a realist. Not in the philosophical sense – he has an ease about him to follow the evidence wherever it may lead. Two plus two always equals four in his book, and no one on the planet is going to trick him into thinking its five.
The Jesuits have been under the radar, officially, far too long. Blowing the door wide open on the order is long overdue. Much of the power that was attributed to Jews by the bigots of centuries past, was actually manifested by the Jesuits themselves.
The danger of the new age should never be underestimated, though, I agree 110%. And it may even be far more organized than is apparent from our vantage point. I have come to believe that the power pulling the strings behind the whole network is Freemasonry. The new agers admit the spiritual lineage, but it is more concrete than that. Also, the Jesuits and Masons have been arch enemies from the beginning. Infiltration by both sides has proved a phenomenal success. Some have concluded that both secret societies are so corrupted by one other, there may not be any practical difference between them anymore."

Anonym: Also, Terry, why do you so willingly take the negative side of the Jesuits before you ever get around to the kind of research you say you want to do?
"You have a point. Right now the limited knowledge I have gathered from biased sources leads me to have a negative outlook on them. I may have bought a few lies in forming my opinion, that's why I wanted to seek out a balanced book on the subject.
I'll be honest, Fulop-Miller is subtly biased toward the Jesuits. He tries to conceal it but it still lingers at the surface. That's even better, in my opinion. I've only read the bad, so I'm trying to correct it. At least I'm on to his game!
The intrigue and deceit still comes through. You can't deny history no matter what. It's the exaggerations of the opponents that Fulop-Miller tackles the best. I'm not far in the book, but a few of my earlier beliefs have taken different turn, and some have been strengthened. The nature of Loyolas "Spiritual Excercise" being one of them. Much more occult than I had ever imagined.

Paula: I don't understand.
If Pope Clement XIV. dissolved the Jesuit Order in 1773, how is it that there are Jesuits now?
The Jesuits After the Restoration (1814-1912)

Mr. Booch has a pretty attractive writing style, I grant, but not really a weighty argument from my point of view. A fair debate would surely clarify putative contentious points, as I believe, as long as he doesn't insist to be just sketchily and kind of patronizing in a slighting way. His reaction is understandable but way too coarse-grained and therefore not acceptable. Regarding the Doctrine of Infallibility, for instance, those big ONLYs show blatantly that he isn't aware at all of the political idea behind such an absolutistic dogma of moral impregnability, and this issue could be brought "off the table" easily and quickly, I suppose. Or does he know already of the correspondence between Cardinal Leonardo Antonelli and Pierre Antoine Comte Daru on March 1870 on behalf of Pope Pius IX? Somehow he seems to be quite naive for his profession, and he missed the crucial point dramatically as well as frivolously. That's really too bad, but nevertheless intriguing, too. Bit like theatre performing instead of truth seeking ...
"Well, Dude, you've certainly coverred a lot of ground pretty fast, for an amateur! Good work. Also, keep in mind that no religious faith commands your adherence, as St. Paul said, and Christ hinted, unless it is true. It was the apple in the Garden that tempted Eve because it was appealing. If you remain committed to, and open to the truth, you'll be fine. Best of luck to you. PS for Terry: What difference do you claim exists between Christians and Catholics?"
Well, Booch, listen to the show!

Feud Letters against the Count Paul von Hoensbroech

Terry: "In general, much study was done on the lives of Mozart and Beethoven. Why? Because according to the substantial lists uncovered over the years, nearly all of their friends and acquaintances were Illuminati. Not just Freemasons – as many have known for awhile, even Mozarts' affiliation with the latter – but major members of the Illuminati. Reading works on the life of Mozart, especially, is to learn the history of a powerful clique of Illuminati, mostly in and around Vienna. His patrons, his friends, his Freemasonic buddies: now confirmed members of the Illuminati. The significance of this is open to debate, but the mere fact that this history hasn't been told is enough for me.
The most informative part of the membership bios is the length to which I document the importance of pedagogy to the Illuminati. Sutton has written about it, and identified Pestalozzi and Wundt as the most influential. Basically, the educational techniques exported to the North American continent during the 19th century were not only traceable to members of the Illuminati, but they are methods of control being practiced within the Minerval lodges of the society itself. All members were tested with the techniques, and it made a lasting impression on them. It wasn't that Pestalozzi et al. had discovered it by themselves, they had learned it through association with the Illuminati. (As for Pestalozzi, I back up this assertion by quoting letters he sent before and after his initiation). The main goal of the Illuminati was to institute and control an educational empire for the indoctrination of the young. It worked, and still does.
Books like The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America and The Underground History of American Education go into the details. Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt and John Taylor Gatto aren't experts on the history of the Illuminati, however – they didn't realize the true extent of what they had found."

Well Greg, I went to a Pestalozzi school over seven years … some time ago. So please, don't judge me that hard.
"Pestalozzi held the position of a leader and mentor and he liked to be called Father Pestalozzi." Amen.

Speaking of education … Charles Coppens SJ 1911:
"1. Jesuits are often much amused at the strange notions entertained of them by intelligent and otherwise well informed men and women in this land of general education. The non-Catholic world, as a rule, does not know what to make of them. Some however among the bitterest opponents of the Catholic Church claim to understand all about the Jesuits, and exert themselves to the utmost to denounce them as constituting a secret society plotting in every land, and in the United States in particular, for the destruction of liberty, and the establishment of an absolute dominion in Church and State.
2. When such misrepresentations are widely circulated, the amusement of the Jesuits is of course changed to sadness, on seeing that their pure intentions for the greater glory of God and the eternal welfare of souls are so strangely misunderstood. Such was the case, for instance, when last summer a pamphlet was circulated in one of our Western cities, of which 50,000 copies, it is said, were distributed gratis, containing, amid scores of false charges, the following lines:
'Today the Church and the Order of Jesuits are working as a unit to make America Catholic by methods which, if successful, must inevitably destroy our American Government, root and branch.' (Life & Action, Vol. 2, n. 2, p. 123) The writer of the pamphlet quotes with full approbation, from an anti-Jesuit work, as follows: 'The General (of the Jesuits) is placed above all governments, constitutions, and laws, and even above God himself. There are no laws of a State, no rules of morality established by society, no principles of religious faith established by any Church - including even the Roman Catholic Church itself - that the Jesuit is not bound to resist, when commanded by his General to do so, no matter if it shall lead to war, revolution, or bloodshed, or to the upheaval of Society from its very foundation.' (lb. p. 124)
3. Such charges may not be believed to the letter by persons of even average common sense, but yet they help to spread and deepen a common impression that the Jesuits are a very wicked and dangerous body of men. What makes the matter still worse is that any one who would wish to examine for himself, and for this purpose look for information at the public library of his town or city, is very likely to find there no works on the subject but such as are written by bitter enemies of the Jesuits, for instance 'The History of the Jesuits' by Nicolini. These reasons have induced the present writer to compose a plain, clear and exact statement of the truth, which, though very brief, may give the honest enquirer satisfactory and reliable information."

Some connections that Jon is aware of & Jon's brilliancy vs. Jim's resiliency