June 5, 2009

remarkable lines

"Many that I brought on were also agents of the Vatican. I learned that the hard way. But it was a learning process, and I'm not afraid to bring them on again. Because this time, maybe I know a little bit more. And through what I've learned to the people on this show that were really enlighten me through the word of God, I can bring it on: if they can not mention it, this connection, I will. And perhaps together we can again expose the Vatican for what they really are: a bunch of criminals who are hiding behind and using the word of God to lie to people. They have many shills, they have shills all over – I can name a hundred right now. But guess who their main one is – it's Jesus Christ."
Greg Szymanski
"Consequently the idea is that god created the whole heavens and the whole earth and he owns everything on it, and so therefore he turned it over to his son, Jesus, his son. But since Jesus isn't here, somebody has to run this place. So, since Jesus isn't here, the Pope said I will be the Vicar of Christ. I'll stand in for him till he gets back. Then when he gets back, I'll turn over the whole world to Christ, but until he gets here, I'm in charge! Okay? As long as you understand that, we're going to do just fine. Now, the first thing the Pope did after declaring himself the Vicar of Christ, made himself the owner of all life on the earth, for Jesus. Jesus owned the whole earth but he ain't here, so I do. Second: he made a contract with the King of England. It was a commercial treaty of sorts with the King of England in which he gave the possessions of Jesus which he held as the Vicar of Christ to the King of England as a corporate holding company. So, the whole world would be under the King of England FOR the Pope. So the Pope owns it but the president of the corporation is the King of England, and that whole corporation menagerie is called 'The Crown'. So when you hear about the British Crown, you have to understand that there is a world of difference between being Engl-ish and Brit-ish. British comes from an Hebrew word, berith. A 'berith' is a contract in the old Hebrew language, and 'ish' is a man or men. Therefore berith-ish becomes british – man of the contract."
Jordan Maxwell
"When you have organized religion, you have a priesthood and everybody else is the laity."
Eric Phelps
"Mystery is the very heart of Roman Catholicism. Pope Paul VI's Encyclical on the Eucharist is titled 'Mysterium Fidei' (Secret of Faith). Vaticanum II (Oct. 1962 - Dec. 1965) refers repeatedly to the 'Mystery of the Eucharist'. The Vatican's new universal Catechism declares that all of the churches liturgy is Mystery! And that its aim is to initiate souls into the Mystery of Christ. It is Mystagogy!" Dave Hunt
"So, the whole Bush dynasty is Knight of Columbus with Jeb Bush, Knights of Malta, Bonesmen, Freemasons and Jesuits. In that family alone you see the unity of all the most powerful secret societies which further proofs our point that all these secret societies work together, subject to the Jesuit order."
Eric Phelps
"The once Murdoch sold them the idea, that let's not just censor news and not tell people the truth about the Reichskonkordat, about the 300-mile wide Pentagram, let's turn it into entertainment, they loved him, and that's why he succeded: he is the great entertainer."
Frank O'Collins
"The papacy has put together an infrastructure here in the U.S. to carry out a North American Jewish Holocaust as well as the Holocaust against true Bible believers and any 'enemies of the state'."
Eric Phelps
Once you begin to see how words and terms and symbols are used, and of course symbols are extraordinarily important in world affairs. If you don't think so, if you don't understand the concept of how important symbols are, put a swastika on your arm and go to your local synagoge and watch the reaction you get. Symbols mean things to people, and the powers that be in this world have set up a world of symbols and emblembs and terms and catch phrases, and once you understand how this system works, it's fascinating! Because for the first time, the world opens up to you a whole new perspective on how government works, on how banks work, on how institutions and education … why we have something called "The Police". Where does the word "Sheriff" come from. Why do you have go-vern-ment.
Once you begin to see how these words are used and put together, all of the sudden it opens up a whole new perspective on how stuff is happening. Because in the world today most people look at the things which are happening in this world and they can't make heads and tails out of it. It doesn't make any sense at all. It's destructive, it's lunacy, it's chaos. But in point of fact, the things which are happening in this world are not chaos at all. It is very well planned, organized and directed. There is an hidden agenda, so to speak."
Jordan Maxwell
"The Pope authorized the invasion of Ireland and sent the king a ring of investiture as Lord of Ireland."
Richard Bennett
"Greg, is America just a big invasion of bodysnatchers or anyone of these movies, you know, the ones where a shadowy enemy changes the pattern the way people think, and we are the outsiders with the problem? Because that is the way I feel."
"Thousands of proofs, incidents of conversation, questions put at long intervals on delicate points, and imperceptible circumstances of the drama, have always resulted in an agreement so exact, positive, and formal, that truth alone could produce such perfect coaptation. [...] I have no doubt, therefore, if the authenticity of the narrative become the subject of serious discussion, that narrator will rise victorious over every difficulty that can be raised up against him. [...] Now, the Theocratic genius, founding its domination on the alleged interests of God – covering them with the impenetrable veil of the Sanctuary – marching with the infinite resources aquired in a long practice of confession, in a profound study of the human heart, and in the arsenal of all the seductions of matter and mysticism, taking for the auxiliaries of its inimitable design human passions, obscurity, and time – the Theocratic genius – if, with a deliberate consciousness of its aim, it has constituted itself a hierarchical militia, detached from all ties of affection – must necessarily carry to its maximum of concentration and energy that politic spirit before which persons and the morality of actions disappear, and which retains but one human sentiment and one moral principle – that of absolute devotedness to the animus of the corporation, to its aim and its triumph."
Victor Considérant
"The Columbian system goes back to the Columbian faction of the Illuminati, back in the early 1700s, not the late 17th. You began to see why Space Shuttle is called Columbia. You have Columbia University, Columbia Pictures, Columbia Broadcasting. Columbia is a very interesting word, and it's connected to the Jesuits. Incidently, the Jesuits are very pronouncely involved in the destiny of this country. The Jesuit order is very much involved in the founding of this country and the direction of its politics. Georgetown University, from which many of the presidents and big shots in government get their education, is a Jesuit university."
Jordan Maxwell
"Today when you see, once a year, at the State of the Union, when you see the president comes out and the Speaker of the House says: 'Ladies and Gentlemen, the President of the United States', everybody in this country thinks this is the President of America. America doesn't have a president. This is a corporate term used in business. The United States Corporation is a privately owned company. It's privately owned. And it's a ten miles square that it operates in called 'The District of Columbia'. 'Columbia' simply means universal. This is what 'Catholic' means: universal. When you start tracing back the ownership of the corporation called 'United States' privately owned company, then you began to see that, if you say that you are a citizen of the U.S., what you're saying lawfully is that you are an employee of a foreign corporation on the International Maritime Admiralty Law. You are an employee of a privately owned company."
Jordan Maxwell
"All of these things in the 4th session of the Council of Trent are condemned, anybody who believes in freedom of speech, and freedom of conscience, and freedom of the press.
So, those maxims of the Council of Trent are brought into The Protocols when The Protocols condemn freedom of conscience. They condemn freedom of the press. They condemn national governments and national sovereignty."
Eric Phelps
"Diego Laynez went on to be the Jesuit General after Loyola. Laynez was the second Jesuit General. He was the master-mind of the Council of Trent. Laynez was a Jesuit by allegiance, and a Jew by race. This is very important. And it's the result of Laynez being a Jew, when this was brought to light in 1593, that the Order passed a statute that no Jew could ever be in the Jesuit order again. This is very important. This is why Weishaupt was not a Jew. It was against the constitutions of the Order for a Jew to be in the Order."
Eric Phelps

object of uniformity

To avoid entering into too great detail about the Jesuit Petre, I will only quote some extracts from the reports of the Tuscan Ambassador in London, Terriesi, quoted by Taunton […]:
"Writing to the Grand Duke (July 22, 1686) he says: 'Let your Highness prepare to hear continually fresh news of this country both as to its temporal and spiritual affairs. For the King seems determined to push forward in matters of religion as far as he can. And the Jesuit Petre, who governs him, is the man to force him to extremes without a thought as to the consequences. He says plainly that Protestants believe 'that the Jesuits are at present the primum mobile of the government.'" "Writing December 30, 1686, he says:
'The Jesuit Father Petre rules His Majesty's mind more than ever.'
"Writing August 15, 1687, Terriesi says : 'The report they [the people] circulate, ascribing all the trouble to the Jesuits' counsel, by which they say His Majesty is completely governed, is most intolerable to the King. Yet I believe it in a great measure to be a calumny, still, as His Majesty has the Jesuits so constantly with him, it causes suspicions, which will be worse if Father Petre becomes Cardinal, as it is said the King certainly wishes.'"

The Jesuit Petre attained to the height of his political activity on November the 11th, 1687, when James II made him a member of the Privy Council. As Privy Councillor Petre took an oath of allegiance, which would naturally suggest some scruples from a Catholic point of view. But that is where the use of the Jesuit maxim, "the end sanctifies the means," would come in.
Petre accepted his political office by express permission of the Provincial of the English Province, the Jesuit John Keynes, and with the silent consent at any rate of General Gonzalez himself. A letter, dated January 8, 1688, from the General to the English Provincial does certainly express "surprise" that Petre should have been allowed by the Provincial to accept an office "implying interference with matters forbidden by the statutes of the Order", but it does not contain a word of blame, let alone a command to relinquish the office. The letter ends with an assurance that the General would consult his assistants on the matter. As Petre retained his office undisturbed even after this consultation, it may be concluded that it ended in approval of Petre's political office. This conclusion is all the more justified as, if there had been the slightest sign of disapproval, the Jesuit authors would certainly have pointed it out. But they have maintained a profound silence.

Taunton concludes his account of the Jesuit Petre with these trenchant words:
"It is the custom to speak sternly of Petre's foolhardy conduct, and to accuse him of ambition. I think historians have not, as a rule, understood the full position of the case. Petre has been made the scapegoat for others. I do not wish to extenuate his responsibility for the catastrophe, but I do think the chief blame rests on other shoulders. If he were free from ambition, who then were the ambitious men?
Petre, like a good Jesuit, was in the hands of his superiors perinde ac cadaver. It was therefore the superiors of the Society who were the ambitious men. They and they alone are primarily guilty of the fall of the Stuarts. Hitherto they have escaped, while Petre has borne the opprobrium. The General, the Provincial and the Confessor are the real culprits. If, as we know, from a letter dated 3rd March, 1688, the Provincial had, without the leave of the General, allowed Petre to accept the office of Privy Councillor, still the General tolerated it. Considering that they knew all about the man, and yet left him in this position. Considering that they allowed him to take the oath and become a Privy Councillor, who can now say that they were not the ambitious men? The libido dominandi eats into a Society as well as into persons, and more easily where the individual gives up all personal ambition and makes the Society his all in all."

The historians of the Order do not speak of Petre and his political doings unless absolutely obliged to do so. They mostly prefer to ignore the existence of a Jesuit Petre. That is to say, they pass him over in absolute silence. In modern times the Jesuit Duhr is conspicuous for such silence. In his voluminous work of 975 pages, Jesuiten-Fabeln published in a fourth edition in 1904, Petre is only mentioned once in a superficial remark (p. 674), though thirty pages are devoted to the court confessors of the Order and their doings, but Petre does not exist for him.
This silence of Duhr's is all the more striking, considering that eighteen years before (1886-87), in the Zeitschrift für Katholische Theologie, he attempted the defence of Petre in long articles. And in 1904 not a word of such defence, not even a reference to it. Duhr must have had a feeling that it would be best not to reopen the topic of Petre.

From Duhr's defence of 1886-87 we may report as curiously characteristic that it is almost exclusively restricted to refuting the reproach of Petre's having aspired ambitiously to the dignity of a cardinal. This was impossible, he asserts, since Petre, as a professed member
of the Society of Jesus, had taken a vow not to aspire after such dignities. Duhr ignores almost completely the far more serious reproach of political activity, also forbidden
by the Constitutions of the Order, and seals his very extensive defence of his fellow-Jesuit Petre with this assertion: "There are no facts nor authentic, irrefutable conclusions to
justify the accusation brought against the Jesuit Petre. But if incontestable proof should be brought against Father Petre, there would be absolutely no reason why we should hesitate to recognise it, for it would be no more reasonable to reproach an Order of the Catholic Church for having one wicked member than the company of the Apostles on account of one Judas. In any case, truth must prevail."

That is Duhr all over, or rather the Jesuit spirit. The facts, that for years Petre exercised unlimited political influence, that he officially held a political post involving work contrary to the statutes of the Order, as even the General was obliged to confess, these facts, and authentic, irrefutable conclusions drawn from them, exist. And yet he clamours for facts to justify the accusations. Jesuit and ultramontane authors in general know their public.

The comparison between the Order of the Jesuits and the company of the Apostles, among whom there had also been a Judas, is also characteristic. There we have, first of all, the genuine Jesuit arrogance: The company of the Apostles = the Order of the Jesuits. Well, why not? The Order of the Jesuits is the Society of Jesus. But then there is a suggestion of confession and resignation in the reference to Judas, after all, the Jesuit Petre may possibly have been a Judas. How strange, then, that the Superiors of the Order always gave this Judas the highest praise and entrusted him, even after he had played his political, his "Judas" part in England, up to his death in 1699, with the most important offices, as Duhr himself reports! In this way the likeness to Judas extends really to the Superiors of the Order, and the above-quoted opinion of Taunton is thus confirmed. […]

The Jesuit Viller also speaks some plain words, which throw a strong light on the attitude of the Jesuit Order towards the office of princely confessor. Viller, Father Confessor of Archduke Charles of Styria, was one of the most influential Jesuits of Austria. For many years he filled the most important posts in the Order – those of Rector and Provincial. Because of the great favour he enjoyed at court, he had many envious enemies, who denounced him secretly to the General. He defended himself in several long and outspoken letters. On June 8, 1598, he wrote to the Jesuit Duras, German Assistant to General Acquaviva: "In the early days of our Society we all rejoiced if one of us found favour with a prince, and our efforts were directed towards the end of winning the favour of princes. Now there are some who are angry and envious if any one is in favour and labours with good result. Under the pretence of virtue they show zeal for the discipline of the Society and are filled with envy."

In a letter addressed by the Jesuit Francisco Antonio, Confessor to the Empress Maria, wife of Maximilian II, to the General Mercurian, on April 30, 1576, we read: "There is not a bishop, ambassador, or lord who would not desire to have some Jesuits in attendance. The door [to the princely courts] which is closed by the vows after profession, appears in a fashion to be reopened in this way. For there is no lack of those who seek after such posts with princes, and this leads to many abuses. In the first place they grow accustomed to a certain liberty, which is little in harmony with our rules. […] Finally, there is little spiritual advantage to be gained by it: it leads to ill reports about the Society, as people notice that our members tolerate considerable abuses at the courts or else refuse to see them, only because they desire to enjoy this liberty and honour." […]

The following is from an Italian manuscript preserved in the Bibliotheque Nationale in Paris: "Instruction to princes as to the manner in which the Jesuits rule": "As among the reports which the Provincials send in, there are also some which deal with the character, inclinations and intentions of the various princes, the General and his Assistants in Rome are placed in a position to survey and judge of the political state of the world and to regulate the attitude of the Order in accordance with its own interests. In particular, the confessions, which a great many of the Catholic nobility and many Catholic princes make to the Jesuits, are a means of procuring for the Order a knowledge of important matters, an object for which princes have to pay large sums to ambassadors and spies, but which now only costs the Jesuits the money for postage. In the same manner they also learn the disposition of the subjects and know which of them are well-disposed to the princes and which are not. […] In Rome the Jesuits constantly swarm around the cardinals, ambassadors and prelates, and inquire about everything that occurs or is about to occur, and try to turn it to their own advantage, so that events of importance often have an entirely different issue from that which the princes desire. The greater part of the business of Christendom passes through their hands. They prevailed on Gregory XIII to order all legates and nuncios to take Jesuits as their companions and confidants. […] Jesuits who are taken into the confidence of a prince seek advice immediately of the General about matters of importance and follow his directions."

Macaulay sums up his judgment in these words: "They glided from one Protestant country to another, under innumerable disguises, as gay Cavaliers, as simple rustics, as Puritan preachers."
Crétineau-Joly, who writes in the pay of the Order, takes up a peculiar position. He cannot deny the enormous influence of the Jesuit Order on the political conditions of Europe. But he discovers a theory of justification. "In the intention of Loyola politics were certainly excluded from his institution, but in the sixteenth century all matters of the court and diplomacy, and even the wars, had a religious basis. […] The Jesuits were, therefore, compelled to intervene in political and social movements."

And feeling that he has thus cleared the way, he boldly bears testimony to the gigantic political power of the Order. "Colbert, Louvois, Seignelai, Pontchartrain, and Croissy, the Ministers of Louis XIV, were encompassed by the counsels of Father Antoine Verjus SJ. The Marshal of Luxemburg and Villars sought his opinion in affairs of importance. The Count of Crecy, the French ambassador at the German Reichstag, did not wish to be the only one deprived of the illumination of the Jesuits. He besought Louis XIV to obtain for him this diplomatic helper from the Superiors of the Order, and accordingly Father Verjus was instructed [by his Superiors] to repair to Germany. There the breadth of his intellect and the moderation of his character soon won for him the regard of Catholic and even Protestant princes. Baron von Schwerin, ambassador of the Elector of Brandenburg, Grote, the Hanoverian ambassador, both zealous Lutherans, were among his best friends. […] The most celebrated parliamentarians [of France] followed the pious counsels of Jean Crasset SJ."

Me) The "libido dominandi" – that's exactly what our entire, all possessive catholicized mainstream culture is mostly driven by for centuries since the institution came into existence: dominating the other, making belief to get obedience. That's what happens on all levels with every single line of thought, always. Everywhere! No democracy at all can breath with an attitude like this. Therefrom also this permanent fever, this stress, this mania to convince somebody, to proselytize the neighbour in one way or another. Catholic souls are trained for this their whole life. Always wanting to be right, always wanting to be the best subject/superior possible, always being well-behaved, pride soldiers of some sort. A life totally after concepts and guidelines ... Rome has successfully turned Jesus into an autocrat, its autocrat. Its absolutist caesar, its pop icon, for the world. So-called christianity produces right now its own pharaoh, the infallible fuehrer. What could be more spectacular than this! How? Through Jesuitical education and Hollywood television first and foremost, through false flag laws, false flag news, false flag money, false flag idols like Francis of Assisi & Shakespeare, Mozart & The Beatles, and false flag market structures. Through the same amount of false flage terror as well as false flag kindness. Amen.
"The Order of the Jesuits is the Society of Jesus."
They feel themselves literally as walking Jesuses on earth with their Roman king over everything, the godlike General Secretary aka "Christus quasi praesens".

"I'm personally convinced of the great power and deep significance of Christianity, and I won't allow any other religion to be promoted. That is why I have turned away from Ludendorff and that is why I reject that book by Rosenberg. It was written by a Protestant. It is not a Party book. It was not written by him as a Party man. The Protestants can be left to argue with him ... As a Catholic I never feel comfortable in the Evangelical Church or its structures. That is why I will have great difficulty if I try to regulate affairs of the Protestant churches. The evangelical people or the Protestants will in any case reject me. But you can be sure: I will protect the rights and freedoms of the churches and not let them be touched, so that you need have no fears about the future of the Church." Hitler

Hitler was also ready to discuss with the Bishop his views on the Jewish question:
"As for the Jews, I am just carrying on with the same policy which the Catholic church has adopted for fifteen hundred years, when it has regarded the Jews as dangerous and pushed them into ghettos etc., because it knew what the Jews were like. I don't put race above religion, but I do see the danger in the representatives of this race for Church and State, and perhaps I am doing Christianity a great service."
J.S. Conway's Nazi Persecution of the Churches

The three big defenders of the Roman Catholic faith were Hitler, Mussolini, and Franco. All three had concordats with the Vatican.

The domain of official politics at universities, parties, newspapers and the TV pulpit is only a section of and as well a façade for the real politics that isn't spread around and consists of precise, well-planned steps of inculturation - blessed by some sort of World Central Committee which I believe is in the hand of the "Jesuses alive" - like "9/11", like American Idol, like the "Litvinenko-Bonding", or the Dollar Meltdown." The government didn't have "failed you" - that's simply how agents work: to mislead other's thinking onto false premises so that the game can be dominated.
That's Dick Clarke's and Dick Cheney's job!

June 3, 2009

follow your bliss

@ 130th min – Mike) One of the things McKenna used to say was that nature loves courage, and the point was, you know, do follow your heart and do not be afraid to do the things that you felt were good, right and true, regardless of what the culture of the society may have indicated, you know, and if you did indeed show courage that nature would reward you, and the reward of nature for you courage is that she removes obstacles and presents doorways that open where you never would have expected them, and presents people and events in your life that allow you to continue.
Joseph Campbell who is another one of my inspirations and just an amazing person. [...] His specialty was mythology, comparative mythology and comparative religion, and he was very well versed on the mythologies of many many many different people over many many ages across this entire planet. And Joe used to talk about a similiar concept of being helped by hidden hands, and he had his own way of saying what Terence said, and of course he said it before Terence, and Terence had his way perhaps of saying what Joe said. Joseph Campbell – one of the things that he is most known for is a simple phrase. That's this one: "Follow your bliss!"
And Joe argued very convincingly actually, and in his own life and work, that if you follow your bliss, well, you know, you will have the same result as if you show courage in the way that Terence described: "Nature loves courage." They were saying the same thing. And Joe always said that if you did that, you would be helped by hidden hands and doors would open, doors of opportunity where you least expected them, and you would been helped by people who you perhaps wouldn't not of imagine being helped by. So, these are the same ideas and the central motive is that you be who you are. You're not be defined by the culture, you're not be defined by the society, you're not be defined by institution and convention. You be who you are. You follow your own path. And you do it with courage, you know. And you follow your bliss.

The big difficulty or one of the many challenges in a culture like ours, in a society like ours, in a time like ours, is how do you even find out what that is: what really gives you bliss, you know. How do you find something that you are willing to be couragous in your persuade of. The path of psychedelics are perhaps, well not perhaps, are certainly one venue, that this can be attempted and very often achieved. The business of shamanism [...] is to help and to heal. The primary function of the shaman is to help and to heal, and to make art. But the first business of anyone – certainly before a person becomes a shaman – they have to take care of their own business.
You know, you cannot help others until you yourself are okay. And this is the fact of the matter! It's about clarity in understanding of situations in a sort of things. So, if you are unclear and confused and giving advice ... you know, I mean, with all the best of intentions, the results were often times not at all pleasent and sometimes catastrophic. What's the old saying? The road to hell is paved with good intentions, right? Well, the thing is, the first of intentions should be: take care of yourself. Heal yourself! Help yourself! Get yourself comfortable and save and secure and honest! Straight about what's really going on in your life and the lifes of those around you.
And once you do that, you know, if that concept of circles that I talk about all the time – your first circle is you! And you square that circle, you get it squared away! You get it straight, keep your own business together. You don't worry about what's happening in the greater world because, frankly, when you are confused and scared and insecure and saturated with propaganda, it's impossible to know! And so for all of us the first challenge I think is to recognize where we are at as individuals, and how we fit into this whole puzzle, and what we can do about our position in it, and how that may effect the greater picture. The circle first goes around you as I say. And then it can be expanded outward, but it happens from inside out, not from outside in. You're not gonna solve the problems of the world by going to Washington and marching on President Bush and whoever else is doing whatever the hell they do there. That's the diversion, right? One of the many. Not that what's going on in Washington doesn't need to be changed, it does! But the way to change it is not by marching on Washington.

The way to change it is by changing yourself. Make yourself into an extraordinary person! Make yourself into a person that nobody else can ignore! Not because of your brutality. Not because of your malice and your pornography. Make yourself extraordinary through good deed and revelation and honesty and truth! And compassion in a way of the shaman, you know, it's available to everybody now. We talked about shamanic technic couple of weeks ago, well, it's available to everybody now. You don't have to be a shaman. You don't have to save the world. But you can utilize the technic and help yourself and your family and your friends and your community and eventually maybe Washington. And it's important to recognize that the methodology ... it's amazing this talk that we just heard from Terence. In 1987! 21 years ago. And it's hysterical because Terence always talked about back then, 20 years ago and further back, about how the psychedelics presented such a grand opportunity because it was immediate! You can get the benefit quickly. And he recognized more than 20 years ago that this was something that had to happen fast. We don't have time, you know, to mess around with things that are going to take decades or centuries to perfect. The path of psychedelics are so profound in the experience of that, that if the right people do it, it could bring about tremendous change very very quickly. There is no question about that. So, you just got a hope that the right people are doing it. And that's one of the reasons why I do the show and talking about this stuff so often is because there are some people out there who are the right people, who should be doing it, and who aren't. And so, one of my charges, one of my responsibilities is to, you know, share this information as it has been shared with me. To try to get the arrow to its mark. And that's what this whole business is about: getting the arrow to its mark!

Me) From a piety-theoretical viewpoint, of course, the question comes in mind why such things as "do follow your own path", "think for yourself", or "wake up" etc. can even play this big role in the public's interest today, when everybody normally thinks of himself as that much of an individual.
There are piety-theoretical aspects all over the place, and the very core of "the conspiracy" also consists of pure piety and uniformity! I think, the post-"9/11" truth movement needs a major shift of its focus on the mysteries of the very blindspot that Richard Grove describes, because by being grounded almost in its entirety on the given conspiracy theatre by professional propagandists such as Jones and Tarpley with their wild and waste New World Order folklore, good enough to entertain the conspiracy-theoretical majority and therewith to generate the well-prepared second main opinion stream beside the plain television mind set, seems to let the movement scrape past the actual key issue which is piety, and not conspiracy. All these issues of highest importance are far more piety-based than a conspiracy like understood in the common sense. Secrecy doesn't actually be our main problem is the point I'm trying to make here. Not what they are hiding but what they are whispering to us is what matters significantly more! Meaning, the whole sphere of public opinion itself, the educational system or the varieties of religious beliefs, for instance, should become major subjects of truthseeking debates. The business of haggling about the entire bandwith of insiders of all sorts must take second place to prudent considerations on principles instead of persons, I believe. The secrecy is just the military feature of the shepherd's fold, nothing more than sheer, definitive brutality. The true art, on the other hand, of that war they are fighting against us all consists of purposely making less-educated and naive ones believe in a proper way, so they can easily be used as servers resp. slaves which includes a lot of subtle and drastic false flag theatre, a lot of psychological terror of confusion, and contempt for mankind in general. Jesuitism as the highly compressed version of Catholicism with its most ruthless and arrogant priesthood of special agents who operate more secretly (Satan) than openly (Santa) being the most effective defenders of the spiritual and therefore political supremacy of the whole Catholic brotherhood and all of their gold, governments, agencies, corporations and institutions of all sorts uses machine-like characteristics of the human soul that are laid out in language, thinking routines and social habits. These are not real democracies we are living in, these are Jesuit (Illuminist, Communist) bureaucracies, what-would-jesus-do neo-theocracies. Absolutist states, so to speak, or just the modern versions of the Roman empire as Eric Phelps characterizes them. Kind of a mafia-style living under a black god-general.