May 31, 2009

idolatry, laity and piety 1

Dennis) And remember how to think! Or just think! I mean, when you see something going on that doesn't make sense, think about it! That's all.
Eric) When you have professionals that don't want to think, it's very hard to having ask the common guy to think, even though they are probably more capable. For example, we have an epidemic of cancer, and yet nobody wants to deal with the causes for that. We have an epidemic of heart desease and don't want to deal with that. So, it's a difficult thing to do but if we want to be free, if we carry with us the responsibility of being able to think for yourself and doing what you need to do.
Dennis) Well, you brought up an interesting term this afternoon, never heard of put quite this way: layman. We have been taught that professionals have to make the laws and the rules and do everything, because we are laymen. And you said – and I never heard it put this way – layman is a term that applies to everything: legal, medical, government. Those in charge know, and the rest of us are laymen, so we don't know.
Eric) That's what they call us. There is no such thing as a layman. It's a ridiculous term. But when you have organized religion, you have a priesthood, and everybody else is the laity. When you have an organized medical profession that's victimizing millions of people every day, you'll have the medical priest, and anybody who studies medicine is a layman. He can't know as much as the doctor, right? It's the same way in law. You have your lawyers and judges, they know it all, but those of us who are not that, we can't possibly know anything about the law, can't we, cause we are just laymen. To be called a layman is to be insulted.
Dennis) Exactly. It doesn't matter, but I wanted to make a point to people out there: We are not laymen at all!

The theory of medicine is completely Jesuitized today.
(John Maynard Keynes – another Jesuit Idol?)

When speaking about loyalty, intended and targeted introduced idolatry, or laymen, for instance, "conspiracy theory" does make its next step forward to serious structural criticism for which I'm putting the question of piety/devoutness into first position asking why somebody wants to believe what he or she believes, thereby dealing with the whole issue of common serfdom to authority. This step appears to me as being absolutely necessary because without it, they can easily keep us cornered in their conspiracy storage siding and nothing will change the Egyptian Shepherd's Fold that we are living under, spiritually and politically literally blindfolded.

From my viewpoint, the phenomena of idolatry and laity perfectly synchronize with Rockefellers "What do you care about them? They are just servers."

Youtube by the way has recently banned (censored) for Germany part 6 (and only part 6!) of an interview with Eric done by Red Ice Creations on September 23, 2007, four days later then published by durian08. The "Hitler-was-a-buffoon" part, you know. Isn't that a kind of ratification somehow?
"He often said, after closing the door: 'My God, what an idiot!'"

@ 14th min – Frank) When you are dealing with understanding the motive of the people you are trying to expose, those people are thinking in terms of hundreds of years, thousands of years. Those people have ... look, the most valuable thing is, they have got over trillion dollars worths of gold in Zürich. That's your gold and my gold. That's not their gold. If you were born in Africa, if you have Afro-American blood than some of that gold is yours, stolen by the Vatican. If you grew up in Europe, or your ancestors grew up in Europe – Ireland, France – than some of that gold is your gold, stolen by the Vatican. But the most valuable thing from the Vatican's perspective isn't gold, cause they've got it all. It's the historical treaties, and genealogical charts, and true history that's locked away in vaults around the world. So when we are trying to understand what's happening in America like the swine flue today, most people who are trying to battle these forces, or trying to expose these forces, have no idea. I talked about the CCR5 anomaly, a natural defect that the ruling families in this world have had nearly three and a half thousand years. They have no idea when we talk about Akhenaten and the () to cyanide that this is a real historical fact. It's real, it's not myth. So, the problem I think people face in America today, in particular the truth movement in America, is that we are not dealing with the same understanding as the people we are trying to expose. And that's why so many people are easily beguiled and throwing off course. From the likes of people like Alex Jones, a paid propagandist. They are the sort of people that easily switch tens of thousands of peoples off therein a blind alley to talk about UFOs when really they should talk about who is behind the swine flue, who is behind pulling the plug on the American economy. So I think, the difficulty for Americans today is this challenge of what is the real history, who is really behind this, and how can I find real proof. Not just accusations, supposition and misdirection.

Greg) That to me is the key issue here. If we are not given all the facts in history, how can we then simulate what's going on today and put it in a proper perspective! That's why shows like this are important because we can add some things and maybe that will help us get to at least an understanding of what's going on and not be let down these rabbit holes like you said by misinformation artists like Alex Jones. [...] What are some other things that we need to look at, that we may have missed? And I think, you cover a lot of this on your website ...
Frank) I would ask anyone listening, and to refer this on, to go and have a look on [...] Francis of Assisi, the greatest saint of the Roman Cult. Go and have a look because if you want to understand what people have missed, the truth, is understanding who Francis of Assisi was.

@ 28th min – Greg) Okay, we're back, all the technical difficulties behind us, my guest is Fank O'Collins, author of The Almanac of Evil. You will get his writings on When you go there, there is so much information. Frank, where do you recommend people start? That's an interesting question because I have gone to your website and I found ... the thing I found most fascinating, and this stimulated a lot of research on my part, and I wanted to thank you, was this connection between father Edmund Walsh, Stalin, and Eisenhower, and Roosevelt, and it gave me a real basis to look into many many things. I did find an interesting speech by Eisenhower after Edmund Walsh died. And it was amazing: without the added information about the behind the scenes of this Jesuit, I would have never understood why they would take this basically educator from Georgetown and elevate him to a status of honor, where an American president honored him in a huge speech. And you can get that on Eisenhower's own website, you know, the presidential website. Quite interesting, isn't it, Frank?
Frank) Well, it is, and I think the answer is, people that are prepared to learn again to have their own interests. It might be from the background, their family history, what they'd like to find out. So people who come from different places, for example, a pastor or someone that may listen or hear of this show, maybe interested to understand the basis behind the whole Reformation and Counter-Reformation, and why in particular for England the Counter-Reformation was so ruthless and vicious. It's until you read, for example, you go on and again look under people, and you go through the 12th century there, when you look at King John of England [...] actually giving up the ownership of England and Ireland to Pope Innocent through a bull called the Golden Bull. It's not to be seen as historic act to realize that when the Vatican went in there, and the Counter-Reformation, and the Jesuits, it was based on to get their property back. [...] But some of the real gems is the use of research I'm putting up there now on people, on bloodlines, on entities, and how it all connects. And I'm really hoping that, like you said, it will spark peoples' interest to understand the motive and the knowledge that these people already have in regard as their most precious treasure.

Greg) When you are trying to understand this story, there comes a point where you reach ... you can't fall into complacency because you say, where else can I go. There is a lot of places to go. And I'll tell you, it's only the beginning, what we are uncovering on this show, of what really happened throughout the ages. Because, you know, it's hard enough to figure out what happened yesterday if you try to reconstruct a crime scene. Just think about going back a thousand years! And I hope that there is something in this story that we bring on this show, which is really a story that I can synthecize down to who controls the New World Order, who is behind it, and the religious and political aspects of it, and how far back does it go. And, in a sence, is the Vatican right now involved in taking back, like you said, the property as they went into England and Ireland to take back what they thought was their property? Are they doing the same thing here in America? My answer to that is, I think, all you need to do is start researching from the point of view you talked about in Ireland and England and see the connections of the Vatican to the formations of our country, and perhaps it's the same modus operandi just in a different manner. What do you think?

Frank) Well, that's right, and I mean, when an American today is concerned for the future of their family and the swine flue, a disease that defies the natural laws of evolution. And I think, people need to understand that. Diseases mutate, but this is the first time that I have heard of a mutating virus being swine flue has combined with a mutating virus being the bird flue to also have the human gens to become a mutating virus of the human. Those three kind of mutating histories to come together and land in Mexico, a country under siege because of its antagonism towards the Vatican ... I mean, the war on drugs and the war of drugs in Mexico is nothing more than the same playbook that was used in southern Italy to break up the first attempt to create Italy as a country, when the Vatican went to its old friend and said, come, build us a network of mercenaries again, in the 19th century, and we know them as the Cosa Nostra, the Mafia. They meet every year in Rome. [...] They still operating. They are the vessels of the pope. So, when people with the swine flue ... they don't unterstand the mindset for this, the motive for this, the history of this. It's all very practical from these peoples' point of view. They don't get emotional about it, we get emotional about it, because we don't want to see millions of peoples die. From their perspective it's just business! And if you don't sign the document, we are gonna kill a few more people!
How simple is that!
So, that's what you're dealing with. You're dealing with people that () and self-fear. Fear is the no. 1 biggest selling product, and they got the market cornered.

And until people understand history, and they are dealing with unknowns, then fear like cement fill within the gaps. So, what I'm trying to do is give people the tools to really play on the same field as they do, and not be fearful, and understand their motives, and understand why. Because in understanding why, you see some hilarious stuff! I mean that quite sincerely, you discover the absurdity of the Chair of St. Peter in the Vatican itself, set up there like a throne, and realize that they went through, well, over a dozen of those. And that the Chair of St Peter is legally supposed to be the original chair. And if its not the original chair, then legally infallibility, ex cathedra, the whole concept in speaking of Chair of St. Peter is an illegal act. It means that all this infallibility debate and all these claims and bulls from the Catholic Church by their own laws are illegal. So when people that see and hopefully learn this ... look, when people start to read and understand the history, they see that ... look, attacking the Vatican, and scream them off, and getting them basically to back in the box, and stop hurting the world – there is so many opportunities to have a goal with them. And it's not just about pedophilia and child molestation. I mean, it goes from everything down to, as I said, I mean, the Chair of St. Peter, the fraud that is the Donation of Constantine, all these things can be used against them. But if people, particular who say they are Christians, that they are Reformers, that they are anti-Papists, if they don't use the evidence that's there, the truth that's there, then they are going in unarmed, half-armed. And they are not going to really find any effective solution to this.

Greg) Good point, and I mean, once you start looking at some of the basic frauds that they have been able to pass off over the centuries – this is not just something that's happened in the 20th century – take for example papal infallibility. That is relatively new. When you really research it, you find, it only came into being in 1870 by a maniac pope. And I use that term not from my perspective but from his own cardinals who called him insane. And so you see that, when you speak of the pope, when you talk to people and you say something against him, they look at you as if you are talking against God on earth. And that needs to be really wiped away. The Bible doesn't talk about it. When you understand the political aspects of this, papal infallibility, the message that they pass, it's nothing but a big lie, and that needs to be exposed. [...] They use religion as a cover. Now, for example, one of the great frauds has been the Apparitions of the Mother Mary. If you look closely, this is nothing new. What about the Apparition of the Mother of Guadaloupe. Mary came there down in 1531 according to them. Interesting that she did just at the time when the Protestant Reformation was taking a big hold and taking a little bit of their property and money away, right Frank?

Frank) Absolutely. Look, example: – and I'm gonna update the website () but the history is there – understanding the Holy See as a corporate entity. A business venture, a joint business venture. And secondly understanding that the legality of that corporation, the charta under which it forms, and operates, and survives, rests on "pillars of salt", rests on sand. It rests on things like apostalic succession. A technical and a very dry argument but nonetheless a crucial legal argument that is: if Pope Benedict can be proven not to be in succession, the successor through historical popes back to St. Peter, then the pope does not represent Christians, the pope is not the representative of St. Peter, and the Holy See is not legally an effective corporation. It is like someone going to court and winding it up. If you can proof that and take that to court, then the Holy See is no longer a legitimate corporation. Now, I find it incredible today that England under Brown is still prepared to watch that country being sliced to pieces and do nothing against the Vatican. I find it extraordinary in America that people are losing homes, life and hope, and America does absolutely nothing against Zürich knowing what Zürich did, to start this from a credit crime ()() of bad loans into a global meltdown. So, I'm hoping that listeners and people I talk to at least start to look at this and go to, and see the facts that have been aright and corrected, because all it takes is one good rock! Just ask King David!

@ 42th min – Greg) The Madoff scandal makes huge news, and then, for example, there is a law suit right now going on in one of our southern states, I believe in Mississippi, where eight insurance commissioners from eight states have gotten together to sue the Holy See for insurance fraud in the billions of dollars. It's huge! Money taken out of American people's pockets through the Holy See, and the story doesn't even get a headline! This is bigger than Madoff but it doesn't get a headline! Why? It shows you the control!
Frank) Because the greatest evil in the world today are the people you watch on the six o'clock news and the faceless people that sit behind their bar line in the rapidly bankrupting newspapers of major cities in America and around the world. People who are self-assured in their intellect who consider all that we speak of as some horrible diversion/delusion, that we are delusional people, that when they get close to the truth, the more unhappy to take that new car, that new job, that new trip, and keep us all as mushrooms. [Einspruch!!] When you have got an intellectual class of people in this world that are more than happy to take these "thirty pieces of silver" and never stand up – unlike the journalist who are prepared to die in Russia to tell the truth about Chechnya [as Gary Webb was as well] – that's the evil that keeps it under it. It's not the politicians. No one should believe that politicians could ever possibly tell the truth. It's just not possible in politics. Nor should I feel that the people behind this who actually do this, the Vatican, are hardly to blame. I can proof to you that these people for the last thousand years have been in business with evil, and look, they haven't changed. What has changed in the last 60 years is that intellectual class, the journalists and the media owners that even today refuse to tell the truth. [...]

And every year, Adolf Hitler is honored. Every year, and not one media outlet – its about all these films on the Nazis – is prepared to even put one paragraph about this agreement ("After 25 years of intense research, padre Peter Gumpel SJ is convinced that Pope Pius XII has deserved it to be canonized."), this incredibly evil act that is right in front of every single eye for the last 60 years. [...] The truth is that the same class of people, [...] I mean that sincerely: The most evil people that I have found, the most cowardly people, the ones that have no spine, our traitors, are the intellectual class [...] the journalists of the world, that are more than happy to take their pie and be self-centered.
And the thing about Murdoch is, Murdoch saw that many of these media outlets are quite comfortable and lazy about [...] they saw an opportunity to turn news into entertainment, he came up with the idea, and that's why they backed him, of turning news from being censored to being entertainment. The once Murdoch sold them the idea, that let's not just censor news and not tell people the truth about the Reichskonkordat, about the 300-mile wide Pentagram, let's turn it into entertainment, they loved him, and that's why he succeded. He is the great entertainer.

Greg) Good point! I didn't think of it in those terms but that's a great way, and you can see what his outlets have turned news into: basically just entertainment. Making it kind of subsidiary of Hollywood, so to speak, so that everything becomes a phantasy, even though it's presented on the news. And if there's any truth, those people are the crazy ones, right? "The ones who are really fundamentalist, really off the wall, you have got to listen to us, our entertaining story first." And that was quite evident in Fox's news coverage of "9/11" if you look back on those early days. They told you a lot of things but I'll tell you what: it served their purposes better than it served truth tellers who really wanted to get to the truth about who caused that event, and I looked at it as, you know, Americans looked at it as, you know, just another escalation of violence of a terrorist group, but they didn't really understand where this terrorist group was formed. And I always said, even the truth tellers who said, "well, the government is involved in this" and they can proof it beyond a reasonable doubt – that's just the first layer, that the layers go so deep that it will go right to, again, right to Rome.

"There is something in this story," Greg, at least for me.
When nearly all internet researchers on all levels call more or less passionately for "waking people up" and "thinking by yourself", "detecting the illusions" and so forth by seeing the world from a new and furthermore changing increasingly more own perspective, I want to make from now on exactly this area of blatant public helplessness and kind of blind-alley self-interrogation resp. appeal to others to the absolute overarching, major subject of my (9/11 Truth) online adventures: mind control per every thinkable sort of piety/devoutness with the Jesus-like Professes SJ as the world champions on this discipline.
The aspect of devoutness beats the aspect of conspiracy by far! Making somebody believe is significantly more important compared to keeping something secret from him. And you can see it, because they are operating quite openly in broad daylight: Ray McGovern (SJ), Michael Scheuer (SJ).
"Il n'y a pas d'assujetissement si parfait que celui qui garde l'apparence de la liberté.
On captive ainsi la volonté même" Jean-Jacques Rousseau in Émile
"Keine Unterwerfung ist so perfekt wie die, die den Anschein der Freiheit bewahrt.
Damit lässt sich selbst der Wille gefangen nehmen."
"No subjection is that perfect than the one that keeps up a pretence of freedom.
Therewith even the will lets itself take into custody."
9/11 is foremost a matter of piety, not of conspiracy!

May 25, 2009

full-blown fascist colony, there is a basis

@ 28th min) I want to take a moment here to thank everybody who listens to my show. You're always welcomed to turn this radio on in the morning and listen, and tell your friends, tell your relatives, tell everyone to catch the Investigative Journal at 9 AM Central, Monday through Friday. It may just give you an impetus to look into things that you normally don't, and that's why I do this show. And also listen to Tom Freiss' show right after mine that's called The Inquisition Update. I love the way he's titled this show because that's what we're under here in this country. And we explain it, I believe, quite well, better than any radio station on this planet. And those other people that do the same thing like Eric Phelps. Nicklas Arthur comes on in the morning and talks about the Bible and things that are very important – I've learned so much from his show. So please, please, don't forget Liberty Radio! Donate to his cause! He spends many many hours, that's Nicklas, the owner of this station, trying to bring this message. It's not an easy one. It's probably the most difficult one in this country to bring, but hopefully people will listen.

Now, there's gonna be a change a little bit in my show, not the time of me being on, but just the way I feel about the people I bring on my show. If you go back to my old shows, you'll see that I covered a wide range of topics. Everything from Chemtrails to 9/11, you name it, I tried to cover it and bring people on. Then as I began to horn in on the problem with the Vatican, I concentrated for years on this subject and said I would never stop. I never will. But it's time to bring people on again. It's time again to go back and bring these people on. Some of the people that I had in the past, that talked about Chemtrails, some of the people that didn't quite make the connection between the Vatican and what we're doing. But it's all involved. The Vatican is behind most of the things we talk about here, if not all. 9/11, the Chemtrails, the stuff in your food, the FDA. And there are so many people that I've brought on, that understood it, many they didn't. Many that I brought on were also agents of the Vatican. I learned that the hard way. But it was a learning process, and I'm not afraid to bring them on again. Because this time, maybe I know a little bit more. And through what I've learned to the people on this show that were really enlighten me through the word of God, I can bring it on if they can not mention it, this connection, I will. And perhaps together we can again expose the Vatican for what they really are: a bunch of criminals who are hiding behind and using the word of God to lie to people. They have many shills, they have shills all over – I can name a hundred right now. But guess who their main one is. It's Jesus Christ. And that's what makes them the Abomination of the Earth, the whore that rides, you know who they are, and we try to expose that here. So in the weeks that come, it will take a little while to find some of these people that I used to interview. It may takes some time to get more people on, talk about other issues, but I plan to do that, it's time again.

And I feel inspired to do that because there are so many problems, and I believe now, some of the things that I didn't say then, when I had people on, oh like Ray McGovern if he has the guts to come on my show again. Cause he was trained by a Jesuit, and he said that he was trying to get to the truth about the – remember – the weapons of mass destruction. Well, let's ask Mr. McGovern next time what his allegiance is to Georgetown, what his allegiance is, and what his church is all about. He told me, he was a minister or something up there on some new church in Washington. Let's find out because back then I was courteous enough not so say anything. But I feel obligated now to talk about it. And perhaps we can understand even more. So I wanna take this opportunity and maybe take that step into the unknown with some of these people who whether I know they are Jesuit agents, or whether I don't, but somehow seem to forget about this subject, and bring them back on and see what they have to say now. And I just wondered if you thought that would be interesting. If you're listening and you have any comments about what I just said, you can email me at (gregbeacon)AT(gmail)DOT(com) and I'll respond, or you can call me at 559-781-3883, and we can talk about this. And another thing I want to talk about is, you know, Tony Alamo sits in the jail, and the Alamo ministry sits in the jail but I see very little support in the patriot community for him save this show and a couple of others like Tom Freiss' show. Why? It's a good question. Maybe we can get to the bottom of that by simply asking people. And I will say it too: I made a mistake during a number of years in my early broadcasts by trying to be too politically correct but not asking the tough questions, by basically giving the guest the benefit of the doubt, but I don't want to do that any longer. So I'm gonna make it perfectly clear to many of the people that were on my show in the past and the new people I look for, that are dealing with these subjects of 9/11, Waco, all the ... I want to make it clear to them when they come on that I'm gonna deal with this issue, and you want to talk about it. And if they don't, I'll tell you why they didn't come on the show, and then you can email them. But I don't think we need to hide any longer, I don't think we need to be politically correct about these issues any longer. I think it's time, at least in my mind, to open this show up a little bit more again. I like I used to. But to do it with a little bit more of wisdom that I didn't have before. And hopefully, hopefully it will open the minds and hearts of more people. I know some people are at a point in their life, they can't listen to this, and they turned me off for this reason. I don't want to turn these people away any longer, I feel an obligation to speak with them. And so perhaps I can speak with them through topics of their interest and show them the connection between the perpetrators that we talk about today and even what's going on in your sky, even in the food we eat. There is a basis for this. [...]

@ 36 th min) You know what he said? He said, "to all my critics (including me), when you do as much good works as I've done to help my fellow man, then you, you know, are the ones that need to be criticized. So what was he doing? I brought it out in my show: he was relating salvation to works which is exactly what the Jesuits do when in fact it has nothing to do with that. Salvation has to do with grace, and has to do with the word of God. Has nothing to do with the supposed good that Mr. Horowitz said he's doing, that his detractors aren't doing, and evaluating us on those terms, which is exactly how you were valuated when you were a young Catholic. But never is there a mention in the Bible, never is there a mention of these secret societies, never is there a mention of the corruption within the Vatican, the corruption within these groups like the Knights of Hospitaller and the Knights of Malta – they're all one and the same when you do your research. So again, maybe we should have Dr. Horowitz on to explain it, he has the guts. Maybe we should have Alex Jones on again and explain what he does, but he won't come on. He hides behind his own show and lies to you. Maybe we should have all these people on again. Let me know what you think! I thought it was a waste of time but maybe it isn't, because there is a time and a place for everything. And it's about time that we alert people who first come to the internet of what these people are all about and what we've learned about it. Maybe I do feel an obligation because of my personal experience with those organizations finding out the hard way exactly what they're all about. So we'll get to this in later shows. Let me know how you think about that! And I will continue. So, I was in the middle of a very important conversation ...

Me) Allright. That was great! I could give you some names.
My three favorites for investigative interviews were Richard Grove, Eric Shine (more recently – sometime someone ought to put him straight on the plain fact that aristocrat families would be nothing without their quasi-godlike status for which always others were in charge: the champions of interpretation secretly as well as openly ruling over the mysteries in the world, the priesthood), and of course, I'm still interested in a personal commentary by Walter Burien on the today's long-planned global financial crisis.

Steven Hairfield would be magnificient! Theologian David Ray Griffin was certainly interesting, and, I think, also doable without much preparation. Not so with Mr. Tarpley "No one can out-talk" him. Well, Eric could, couldn't he. Maybe I had some good first beginnings about Webster, our famous conspiracy master and immense gatekeeper never considering the church, but that's an operation of its own for a couple of months that come. Both Griffin and Tarpley have already been given interviews or lectures along with William Engdahl and others as invited guests at a Swiss online diarist who I call the "Alpin Alex Jones", Mr. Sound & Smoke ("all hollow words").
Alex Jones doesn't make any structural demands at all. Like I said, he's just a big instantaneous water heater, a loud and lying cheap-Jack for every sort of conspiracy stuff. He never wanted to achieve a piece of coherent information, not to speak of efforts for systematic descriptions. I don't even know how to take him seriously anymore! Somehow he squelches everything together, digests it, and what remains then is ... I rather won't say it. 7 years after 9/11, he still speaks of "those Jesuits" if they were totally unreal gestalts who simply don't make it to arouse his interest.

Do you remember Brian David Andersen?
("On May 14, 2008, an historic and pivotal event took place")

He was a very precise conversational partner with deep insights:
@ 17th min – Greg) "This war would never have been possible without the sinister influence of the Jesuits. We owe it to Popery that we now see our land reddened with the blood of her noblest sons. [...] I pity the priests, the bishops and the monks of Rome in the United States, when the people realize that they are, in great part, responsible for the tears and the blood shed in this war. The later the more terrible will the retribution be. I conceal what I know, on that subject, from the knowledge of the nation. For if the people knew the whole truth, this war would turn into a religious war, and it would, at once, take a tenfold more savage and bloody character, it would become merciless as all religious wars are. It would become a war of extermination on both sides.
The Protestants of both the North and the South would surely unite to exterminate the priests and the Jesuits, if they could hear what Professor Morse has said to me of the plots made in the very city of Rome to destroy this Republic, and if they could learn how the priests, the nuns, and the monks, which daily land on our shores, under the pretext of preaching their religion, instructing the people in their schools, taking care of the sick in the hospitals, are nothing else but the emissaries of the Pope, of Napoleon, and the other despots of Europe, to undermine our institutions, alienate the hearts of our people from our constitution, and our laws, destroy our schools, and prepare a reign of anarchy here as they have done in Ireland, in Mexico, in Spain, and wherever there are any people who want to be free."

@ 44 th min – Greg) Now take for example Ray McGovern. He ist Fordham trained, Jesuit trained, CIA analyst. He runs an ecumenical church in Washington DC that's supposedly unifying all religions together which tells me there, that's the Jesuit idea to get everybody secretly under the control of the pope, and then at times he blames the Jewish lobby for our problems. Outspoken critic of Bush and Cheney but will not people word out about the Vatican! So that tells me, there is a problem. […] And also the Point B: Can it be possible, a man of this education doesn't know? I find that hard to believe.

@ 48th min – Brian) Don't go into the polarities because that's exactly where they want you. […] When you are not going into the polarity, you're not in their plan.

@ 52th min – Greg) Here is the point: if we openly talk about this, if we ask the right questions to guys like Tarpley … Ask him, why he doesn't emphasize the Vatican-led New World Order!
Brian) That's exactly what I saw on Deagle's Show today. I mean, here is a guy who is higly connected through his education, and he makes this blatant statement on the Deagle Show, he said: "oh … there is no … oh … central … conspiracy, this is all just fragmented, types of monster fighting on another."
Why must Blair became a Roman Catholic, and why is he now running for European president? Why is the EU in its documents saying that it's Catholic dominated?

@ 55th min – Brian) As soon you start talking about The Facts & The Evidence, they shut you down. Or just totally ignore. "No message is more important and critical than the exposure of the Jesuits and the Vatican as the originators and architects of the New World Order. The Jesuits and the Vatican desire to put all humans under a police state while forcing you, me and everyone else to worship the Pope."

Me again) Therefore I think, the legendary David J. Smith has deserved an appearance as investigator on The Beacon, and so has perhaps Naomi Wolf. Among other things, she did a conversation with Viet Dinh in person directly at Georgetown University, which even has been shown on Youtube for a while. Her Clinton background could possibly become an exciting subject for deeper exploration. Furthermore, I would find dialogues with men like Jean Ziegler or Richard Rohr very useful.

From his book @ p. 25) "Purpose of the spiritual exercises is to find ways into Christian freedom. This will be enabled by a figural relationship to Jesus in which we are capable of hearing Christ's calling and becoming ready to go into his commission. The enneagram is an allied and, in some respect, even more precise tool to achieve this objective. That's one of the reasons why a row of Masters of Spiritual Exercises has begun to also employ the enneagram besides the traditional Ignatian exercises. [...]
Christus represents God and thereby the essence of the world, the true being. At the same time, however, he was a real human being who has abided the conditions of the existence with its threats, temptations and abysms: 'For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities, but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.' (Hebrews 4: 15) Hereafter, when we speak of the enneagram as the icon of Christ's face, we are interpreting it as 'the face of God', and likewise as 'the face of the (true) human being'."

Hiram said it: "They utilize anything & everybody to bring their means to an end."

In one of your broadcasts in January or February, you made the offer to high-ranking Catholics to come on the show – exactly what's been needed! But above all, we need one or a few fair researchers who are strongly convinced of the "Jewish World Conspiracy" and ready to honestly debate the main issues in public. I believe, that's the most important thing anyway, right now. And, you know, "there is a basis for this".

May 18, 2009

they will do anything, there is no limit

@ 55th min) Treason from one end of the spectrum to the next, all controlled by the Vatican […] in putting the Chinese people under a Chinese inquisition, so that the land owners could be killed, so that any middle class could be killed, so that anybody who had any wealth could be killed […] It was the CIA that brought up the Dalai Lama in 1959 out of Tibet, so Mao TseTung could take his Chinese lords, and begin to kill the Tibetans, and carry out an inquisition with his Red Army.
All of this is a Jesuit inquisition, no matter what you wanna call it. All controlled by Rome through the American Council on Foreign Relations which is controlled by the Archbishop of New York, for which reason John Paul II said that Cardinal O'Connor was the "Archbishop of the Capital of the World". New York City is the Fort of all political power in the earth as controlled by the Vatican, London is the economic colossus, and Rome is the religious centre. And through those three centres the Jesuits control all academia, all the monies, all the religions, all the politics that are presently in the world today, specifically in the Western hemisphere.
So, this is the Jesuit inquisition that they have launched: we reviewed Russia, we reviewed China, we reviewed someone in Europe, we reviewed in Italy …

@ 64th min) Here is another quote: "We [the Popes] hold upon this earth the place of God Almighty." Who said this? Pope Leo XIII, 1894: Encyclical Letter in June 20, 1894. And it's this very same Pope Leo XIII who succeeded Pope Pius IX. It's this very same Leo XIII who had a cardinal secretary who's name was Mariano Rampolla del Tindaro who was according to Craig Heimbichner in the Blood on the Altar a member of the O.T.O., that's right. Cardinal Secretary to the Pope, the second most powerful in the Papacy was a member of the O.T.O. just like Aleister Crowley. No wonder Satan sits in the Vatican.

Look further, here is another quote: "I am the pope. I am king over all. I am God on earth. When I speak, my word is the word of God, and you are to remember this as long as you live." Who said this? Pope Pius XI in 1924. This is 1924. This year my father was born. This isn't too distant for me. 1924, speaking to schoolchildren at the Vatican – the book is "Alien Rome". I read that again: [...] Now what is that have to say for inner religious dialogue? It's a farce! Anybody negotiating for the Papacy is negotiating for a man who claims to be "God on earth, King over all". He can not be trialed, he can not be charged with heresy, he can not be charged as a criminal, and prosecuted and punished. This guy claims he has the right to rule the world, and for which reason there is no other man on earth who is allowed to claim the title or the rights of deity. [...] the same time in World War II removing anybody else who claims to be God on earth like Hirohito – one of the reasons for the unconditional surrender that the Pope's CFR-controlled American Government resisted upon. This is why Hirohito would be humiliated, and so he would never be deemed as God among the Japanese. He is just now a political figure. Before that, Hirohito or the emperor of Japan offends () for thousand years! The Japanese regarded him as God manifested in the flesh – there is only one man who regard manifested in flesh: that's the Pope.

That's why this is a war against the Shiite Muslims primarily, because the leader of the Shiite Muslims, their caliph, their imam, he claims their traits of deity. That he's infallible. Whereas the Sunni had caliph, the Sunni had imam – he doesn't claim that. So the Sunnis are not in war with the papacy, and that's why the Sunnis are meeting with the Vatican! And the Wahhabis:
"What connection, if any, there is between Wahhabism and Jihadi Salafis is disputed. Among others, Daniel Pipes claims there is 'a direct line between the Wahhabis and Osama bin Laden'. However, Natana De Long-Bas, senior research assistant at the Prince Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown University, argues: 'The militant Islam of Osama bin Laden does not have its origins in the teachings of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab and is not representative of Wahhabi Islam as it is practiced in contemporary Saudi Arabia, yet for the media it has come to define Wahhabi Islam in the contemporary era. However "unrepresentative" bin Laden's global jihad is of Islam in general and Wahhabi Islam in particular, its prominence in headline news has taken Wahhabi Islam across the spectrum from revival and reform to global jihad.'"
And not the Shiites, not the religious Shiites, they are not meeting, are they. No, the pope is "king over all", he is "God on earth".

Now, here is a response of a real Protestant to this claim: "I refuse the pope as Christ's enemy and Antichrist with all his false doctrine."
That is Protestantism. That is what a true Baptist believes. And you don't find very many of them today. You don't find any Protestants today, cause they're all a bunch of prostitutes. They are prostitute Protestants. They are National Council of Churches Protestants. They are World Council of Churches Protestants. They are all Masonic. They are fraternizing with the whore of Rome. They are just prostitute Protestants, and they're worthless. And you know what? All their churches are going to be destroyed in this country. They were destroyed in apostate Protestant Germany, why wouldn't they be destroyed here? It's all in the making. And all of these apostate Protestants uniting with Rome, and these Evangelicals to fight this crusade of the pope! If we really had any Protestantism in this country, any real bible believers that were hearing to the Reformation Bible, they would say we are not fighting this crusade. We are not going. We will go to jail first.
All the officers who know the Lord will safe us, we will not fighting a papal crusade. We will fight in defence of our country. We will fight in defence of our borders. We will fight in defence of our constitution against all enemies domestic. We will not go half way around the world and fight a war for the benefit of the papacy, so we can bleed and die, or be maimed and broke, and come back here enough be treated ... And what to be the hospital? Letting those soldiers of suffer without treatment. What a disgrace! The whole thing fires me up. [...] All goes back to this damnable doctrine of who the pope thinks he is, and why he can tell you what to do. [...] So we don't have to pay The Pope's Income Tax anymore! And that's all it is. I show in my book Vatican Assassins that the papacy laid upon the nobles and the priests of Europe an income tax to finance the crusades. And they're doing the same thing now! Nothing has changed.

@ 78th min) I'll read that again. "You will not find one of these conspiracies that chief of which after years of care has been able to organize his forces with so little danger, with as great advantages as the General of the Jesuits can command within 24 hours." My friends, there is not one of you that the Jesuit General Adolfo Nicolás ... that he cannot fully know everything about you within 24 hours. He knows your weaknesses, he knows your strengths. He controls the CIA, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, the Defence Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency – all of that is controlled by the General of the Jesuits. All he needs to do is punching your name, and all his servants there and all those agencies get your socialist insecurity number, and they can carve up everything about you. Get all you credit cards, whatever you spend your money on, whatever you do, they can know everything about you within 24 hours. And if they want to attack you they don't write you where to attack you – they know your weakness, they know your strength. There is nothing they don't know about you, so forget hiding from them! They already know. You wanna face them boldly as a man with the sword of the word of God in your hand. With this thing then, and ultimately with this sword of just defence when that day arrives, which will be the gun in defence of our lives, and our fortunes, and our sacred honor after () state succeeds. Yeah, we keep that: every American state succeeds, every one of them. Every Canadian province needs to succeed. We just () national sovereignties once again, and then unite in certain confederations that are limited in their powers, specifically against this great sinister secret society.

Here's another quote: "It is true that, despite all their efforts, […] they [the Jesuits] have been unable to achieve their great aim, that of founding a Universal Roman Kingdom."
Listen to that! What's their great aim? That of founding a Universal Roman Kingdom, a world government under a pope of Rome. That's their design. "Nevertheless it is they who have, with all their skill, all their zeal and all their worldly wisdom, upheld [the Temporal Power of] the secular papacy against every hostile influence." (René Fulop-Miller in The Power and Secret of the Jesuits, 1930) That's right: the Jesuits are the Obsidian Order. They are the pope's Praetorian Guard. The papacy cannot stand, it cannot last without the Jesuit Order. It is vulnerable if the Jesuits do not exist. And there has only been one time when the papacy was ever really humiliated from 606 until now, and that is when the Jesuits were suppressed by the pope. That's when they were formally suppressed and distinguished forever with a papal bull by Pope Clement XIII in 1773. So the Jesuits, what did they do? […] They go underground. They never ceased to exist. Jesuit general Ricci said, no one can release them from their vows. So they went underground. And do you know what they formed? They formed the Bavarian Illuminati. They started another order, a few other orders that they can hide underneath. They were once backing the Jacobins, the revolutionaries in France. [...] Robespierre was trained by Jesuits in the college of Lycée Louis-le-Grand (alumni="illuminated ones") in Paris. He was there student – after they used him, they killed him. And they brought Napoleon in power. And I'll cover sometime what Napoleon did to the great black leader Toussaint of Haiti. How Napoleon betrayed him ...

Adolph Freiherr Knigge was a well-known, high-degree Freemason, a member of the Bavarian Illuminati as probably the most famous front group for the Jesuit Order besides the Bilderbergers, the Opus Dei, or the Club of Rome, and he was a German Jacobin too. And that's already all in Wikipedia!

"During the Order's Suppression from 1773 to 1814 by Pope Clement XIV, General Ricci created the Order of the Illuminati with his soldier, AdamWeishaupt, uniting the House of Rothschild with the Society of Jesus. Weishaupt, the Father of modern Communism, used his bloody Jacobins to conduct the French Revolution incited by his Masonic Encyclopaedists, Voltaire and Diderot. Years later Jesuit General Ledochowski, with his Bolsheviks, conducted the Russian Revolution in 1917 incited by his Masonic Communists, Marx and Engels, it being identical to the upheaval of 1789. What many modern writers of today describe as "the Illuminati" is, in fact and purpose, another name for the Jesuit Order under the allpervading guidance of its master governing Washington, D.C., London, Paris, Moscow, Peking, Jerusalem, Mecca and the Vatican, the Black Pope." Vatican Assassins, Pause II
"In addition to France's expulsion of the Order in 1764 and now her aid to the accursed American "heretics and liberals", the rage of the Jesuits would unleash the French Revolution. They would use Robespierre, brainwashed by Jesuits for nine years in their College of Louis-le-grand, to lead the Jacobins." Vatican Assassins, Chapter 17

@ 91th min) He is the absolute counselor of your conscience. So when the pope or one of his agents, the priest, tells you to do something, it's coming from God. Therefore, if a priest tells you that your president has to be removed, and if you do this, it is no murder to kill this man, you're gonna do it. Do you see how these satanic doctrines () and discord in any political state? No free country can survive with this circulating among his population. If these people believe, if these priests have the power, when all the catholic people or others believe, that these men have the power to forgive them their sins ... that they have this special power, they will do anything! There is no limit what they will do!

May 4, 2009

obedience & opportunism 1

The book details the betrayal of Israel's leadership during the Holocaust, recalling that Rudolph Kastner, 'then one of Israel's most honored leaders, was a traitor who had cooperated with the Nazi leaders of Germany including Adolph Eichmann to deport Jews from Hungary.'
I don't dispute this claim and anyone who does should read Ben Hecht's Perfidy or The Transfer Agreement by Edwin Black. It is the conclusion drawn from this treason, on page 584, which is far more troublesome:
'Ah, dear truth seeker, Zionist Israel is a creation of the Jesuit Order. Its purpose is to secure Jerusalem for the Jesuits 'infallible' Pope, that he may receive worldwide worship from Solomon's rebuilt Temple. If the Masonic Zionists betrayed their own Jewish race into Pius XII's concentration camps overseen by the Jesuit Order, would they not betray the nation of Israel by giving Jerusalem to the Pope in preparation for the rebuilding of Solomon's Temple? [...] Therefore we are living under the preeminence of a Gentile Jesuit conspiracy. It employs notorious Masonic Jews and Gentiles as their agents. This furthers the deception of an international Jewish conspiracy oppressing the nations. Using this lie, the Jesuit General in creating global, anti-Jewish fury again. This fury will culminate in the last mad attempt to invade Israel and destroy the physical descendants of Jacob.'

And who is leading the invasion?
We learn that Bill Clinton was the student president of the Jesuit's Georgetown University and, for a time, expressed the desire of becoming a Jesuit priest. In those days, Clinton was sent to England on a Rhodes scholarship, with all that that implies, and at an anti-American demonstration met Jesuit Friar Richard McSorely, who later headed Georgetown's Center For Peace Studies. On page 672, we get a haunting hint at Clinton's later role in Israel's destruction, as well as those of Norway and France: 'McSorley then went to France and Scandinavia to meet peace people. Stepping off the train right behind him in Oslo, Norway was Bill Clinton.'
And if a Clinton Democrat fails to ignite the flames that will engulf Israel, the Jesuits, 'will use the Republican Party to bring a Jesuit-controlled, Jew-hating fascist dictator to power, 'For the greater glory of the god who sits in St. Peter's chair.'' That's Eric Jon Phelps' explanation why Israel's political leaders, especially those of the Labor Party, are running between, Chirac, King Carlos and the Vatican to secure a 'peace' treaty with the PLO.
I can only advise my readers not to dismiss the possibility that he got it right.

Anonym: "From the early days of the New Age movement, Catholics and Jews have been major targets because they are organized and can't easily be co-opted by a system that wants to change things. The New Age establishment was in worldwide operation as the Nazis were coming to power. Many New Age promoting writers were selling the same agenda as the Nazis, and based on my search of the name, Rene Fulop-Miller, author of the book named by Terry, and other books written by him, he was of that ilk. The Oh Wow gossip factor sells books such as that by Phelps, not a desire to learn about a subject. To show how neutral you are Terry, why don't you suggest a book written by Jesuits themselves on their history."

Terry Melanson: "About Barry: he is above all a realist. Not in the philosophical sense – he has an ease about him to follow the evidence wherever it may lead. Two plus two always equals four in his book, and no one on the planet is going to trick him into thinking its five.
The Jesuits have been under the radar, officially, far too long. Blowing the door wide open on the order is long overdue. Much of the power that was attributed to Jews by the bigots of centuries past, was actually manifested by the Jesuits themselves.
The danger of the new age should never be underestimated, though, I agree 110%. And it may even be far more organized than is apparent from our vantage point. I have come to believe that the power pulling the strings behind the whole network is Freemasonry. The new agers admit the spiritual lineage, but it is more concrete than that. Also, the Jesuits and Masons have been arch enemies from the beginning. Infiltration by both sides has proved a phenomenal success. Some have concluded that both secret societies are so corrupted by one other, there may not be any practical difference between them anymore."

Anonym: Also, Terry, why do you so willingly take the negative side of the Jesuits before you ever get around to the kind of research you say you want to do?
"You have a point. Right now the limited knowledge I have gathered from biased sources leads me to have a negative outlook on them. I may have bought a few lies in forming my opinion, that's why I wanted to seek out a balanced book on the subject.
I'll be honest, Fulop-Miller is subtly biased toward the Jesuits. He tries to conceal it but it still lingers at the surface. That's even better, in my opinion. I've only read the bad, so I'm trying to correct it. At least I'm on to his game!
The intrigue and deceit still comes through. You can't deny history no matter what. It's the exaggerations of the opponents that Fulop-Miller tackles the best. I'm not far in the book, but a few of my earlier beliefs have taken different turn, and some have been strengthened. The nature of Loyolas "Spiritual Excercise" being one of them. Much more occult than I had ever imagined.

Paula: I don't understand.
If Pope Clement XIV. dissolved the Jesuit Order in 1773, how is it that there are Jesuits now?
The Jesuits After the Restoration (1814-1912)

Mr. Booch has a pretty attractive writing style, I grant, but not really a weighty argument from my point of view. A fair debate would surely clarify putative contentious points, as I believe, as long as he doesn't insist to be just sketchily and kind of patronizing in a slighting way. His reaction is understandable but way too coarse-grained and therefore not acceptable. Regarding the Doctrine of Infallibility, for instance, those big ONLYs show blatantly that he isn't aware at all of the political idea behind such an absolutistic dogma of moral impregnability, and this issue could be brought "off the table" easily and quickly, I suppose. Or does he know already of the correspondence between Cardinal Leonardo Antonelli and Pierre Antoine Comte Daru on March 1870 on behalf of Pope Pius IX? Somehow he seems to be quite naive for his profession, and he missed the crucial point dramatically as well as frivolously. That's really too bad, but nevertheless intriguing, too. Bit like theatre performing instead of truth seeking ...
"Well, Dude, you've certainly coverred a lot of ground pretty fast, for an amateur! Good work. Also, keep in mind that no religious faith commands your adherence, as St. Paul said, and Christ hinted, unless it is true. It was the apple in the Garden that tempted Eve because it was appealing. If you remain committed to, and open to the truth, you'll be fine. Best of luck to you. PS for Terry: What difference do you claim exists between Christians and Catholics?"
Well, Booch, listen to the show!

Feud Letters against the Count Paul von Hoensbroech

Terry: "In general, much study was done on the lives of Mozart and Beethoven. Why? Because according to the substantial lists uncovered over the years, nearly all of their friends and acquaintances were Illuminati. Not just Freemasons – as many have known for awhile, even Mozarts' affiliation with the latter – but major members of the Illuminati. Reading works on the life of Mozart, especially, is to learn the history of a powerful clique of Illuminati, mostly in and around Vienna. His patrons, his friends, his Freemasonic buddies: now confirmed members of the Illuminati. The significance of this is open to debate, but the mere fact that this history hasn't been told is enough for me.
The most informative part of the membership bios is the length to which I document the importance of pedagogy to the Illuminati. Sutton has written about it, and identified Pestalozzi and Wundt as the most influential. Basically, the educational techniques exported to the North American continent during the 19th century were not only traceable to members of the Illuminati, but they are methods of control being practiced within the Minerval lodges of the society itself. All members were tested with the techniques, and it made a lasting impression on them. It wasn't that Pestalozzi et al. had discovered it by themselves, they had learned it through association with the Illuminati. (As for Pestalozzi, I back up this assertion by quoting letters he sent before and after his initiation). The main goal of the Illuminati was to institute and control an educational empire for the indoctrination of the young. It worked, and still does.
Books like The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America and The Underground History of American Education go into the details. Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt and John Taylor Gatto aren't experts on the history of the Illuminati, however – they didn't realize the true extent of what they had found."

Well Greg, I went to a Pestalozzi school over seven years … some time ago. So please, don't judge me that hard.
"Pestalozzi held the position of a leader and mentor and he liked to be called Father Pestalozzi." Amen.

Speaking of education … Charles Coppens SJ 1911:
"1. Jesuits are often much amused at the strange notions entertained of them by intelligent and otherwise well informed men and women in this land of general education. The non-Catholic world, as a rule, does not know what to make of them. Some however among the bitterest opponents of the Catholic Church claim to understand all about the Jesuits, and exert themselves to the utmost to denounce them as constituting a secret society plotting in every land, and in the United States in particular, for the destruction of liberty, and the establishment of an absolute dominion in Church and State.
2. When such misrepresentations are widely circulated, the amusement of the Jesuits is of course changed to sadness, on seeing that their pure intentions for the greater glory of God and the eternal welfare of souls are so strangely misunderstood. Such was the case, for instance, when last summer a pamphlet was circulated in one of our Western cities, of which 50,000 copies, it is said, were distributed gratis, containing, amid scores of false charges, the following lines:
'Today the Church and the Order of Jesuits are working as a unit to make America Catholic by methods which, if successful, must inevitably destroy our American Government, root and branch.' (Life & Action, Vol. 2, n. 2, p. 123) The writer of the pamphlet quotes with full approbation, from an anti-Jesuit work, as follows: 'The General (of the Jesuits) is placed above all governments, constitutions, and laws, and even above God himself. There are no laws of a State, no rules of morality established by society, no principles of religious faith established by any Church - including even the Roman Catholic Church itself - that the Jesuit is not bound to resist, when commanded by his General to do so, no matter if it shall lead to war, revolution, or bloodshed, or to the upheaval of Society from its very foundation.' (lb. p. 124)
3. Such charges may not be believed to the letter by persons of even average common sense, but yet they help to spread and deepen a common impression that the Jesuits are a very wicked and dangerous body of men. What makes the matter still worse is that any one who would wish to examine for himself, and for this purpose look for information at the public library of his town or city, is very likely to find there no works on the subject but such as are written by bitter enemies of the Jesuits, for instance 'The History of the Jesuits' by Nicolini. These reasons have induced the present writer to compose a plain, clear and exact statement of the truth, which, though very brief, may give the honest enquirer satisfactory and reliable information."

Some connections that Jon is aware of & Jon's brilliancy vs. Jim's resiliency

May 3, 2009

occultism & opportunism 1

@ 21th min – Frank) I think, a terrible sadness that everybody, and I mean everybody from the time of the Reformation and Resistance and Protestants right through to now, where the great sadness that's happened is to get bogged down in the mud where these discussions of absolute facts are described. But in a way that unfortunately ties one billion good people, honest people, you know, hard working people, to a group of parasites who want nothing more than stay in power and screw with us. And this terrible sadness is that our language has not allowed us to separate. So I think, we're just doing act as you did. Look, we need to take care here, because it doesn't help anybody, and it certainly is kind of counterproductive when we continue to use language like "the Roman Catholic Church". Because ... look: What do the Catholics think when you say "The Roman Catholic Church"? They think "Me". Of course, they think "You". So, we need to say "The Pope"! And that's what they do: They use one billion good people as human shield. I mean, it's unbelievable!
Greg) That's a good point!

Frank) Well, I just think it's time that we consider just as the Jesuits are intelligent men that are given, you know, their dreams to persuade a career, so in doing so work for an organization that's incredible evil. I think we need to take care and be clear and reliable. It's the Roman Cult we're talking about! It's the Venetian Satanic Cult we're talking about, when we're talking about () people. It's a Luciferian Cult we're talking about when we're talking about the Jesuit's worshipping. These are distinct groups with distinct theology that parasites at a handful of people. They're not the people you meet on a sunday or at a dinner. These are not the Catholics that you see who are good people. These are parasites.
Greg) And that's something that has to be differentiated, so that you don't turn off these people right in the beginning. Because I know, that it's difficult. Once you make that connection to the corrupt hierarchy of the Vatican, it automatically then hurts a person and they feel they're corrupt as well, and they're gonna defend themselves. In most times with false history, false doctrine, that needs to be explained, and that's why I wrote a story the other day called U.S. Roman Catholics and Christians don't know what they believe.

On the other hand, there are lawyers from Baden-Wuerttemberg who are laughing right in your face when saying: "learning from the Catholic Church means learning how to win." Like one of the most famous slogans of the communist party secretaries in East Germany, you know: "learning from the Soviet Union means learning how to win." That's what I meant with opportunistically slipping under the corporate, conspiratorial fold of the Papal Shepherds. So, I would state that you're absolutely right referring to all followers of the papacy who enjoy the beauty of catholicism and really believe wholeheartedly in its mysteries, but not referring to all those in whose eyes being in the church (or in the freemasonry, or in scientology, or in the mormon church etc.) is just good for business and the own career in some sort of holding an official, ministerial (bureaucratic) belief. There is no occultism at all involved here, "not a single bit", okay? How many papists, do you think, will simply be opportunistic chickens?

Asking myself, what Count Hoensbroech would comment to the Arctic Beacon on that subject, I found this:
Fourteen Years a Jesuit Chapter IX The Intervening Years – Lourdes and the Kulturkampf
"The most fateful event in ecclesiastical politics of the nineteenth century, which will doubtless continue during the twentieth to exercise a pernicious influence on creeds and religion, the "Struggle with Rome" (Kulturkampf) made the deepest impression on my mind and thoughts.
If anyone had sought to breathe new life into German Ultramontanism and fuse the German Catholics into a political party strong enough to withstand the onslaught of decades, he could have imagined no more effective procedure than the Kulturkampf as conducted under Bismarck's aegis.

Ignorance of the nature of the Catholic religion and Ultramontanism, and of the difference between the two, had induced this great man, in spite of his great intellect, to adopt measures which produced results the very opposite of those he desired to attain. Instead of weakening Ultramontanism and excluding it from the political and religious life of the new German Empire, he helped to increase the power of this worst foe of religion, and to fuse it more closely than before with the Catholic faith which it had so grievously abused.
For every one of the prohibitory laws struck not so much at Ultramontanism as at the Catholic religion, thus wounding most deeply the religious feelings of the Catholics, who thought, often correctly, that their most sacred doctrines were being attacked. The result was an opposition which sent the State "to Canossa" and created the Centre party.

I do not propose here to discuss the Kulturkampf from the aspect of Church politics. I have dealt sufficiently with this in two other books (Moderner Staat und römische Kirche, Rom und das Zentrum), and have shown how a right and necessary struggle with the Church should be conducted. In this place I am dealing with the particular conflict, and its religious effect on myself.
The effect then was to arouse to new life all the ultramontane tendencies that had become mine through inheritance and education.
I saw bishops sent to prison because they refused to accept their deposition from the State.** I saw priests persecuted and punished like criminals
because they brought to the sick and dying the consolations of their religion, or buried the dead with the rites of the Church. I saw police officers and gendarmes force their way into churches and drag priests from the altar in their sacred vestments, because they were celebrating Mass. I saw that which in Catholic eyes is the most sacred of all things, the consecrated host, thrown roughly and violently out of the tabernacle by non-Catholic officials. Sights like these were calculated to inspire my religious heart with frantic devotion for a religion attacked with such amazing folly and brutality.

Nor was it long before the opportunity offered for giving outward expression to my devotion. Our house had become the hiding-place for persecuted priests, who, at dead of night, disguised as peasants, performed the religious offices prohibited by the police. I used to drive them across country by unfrequented roads, and often my swift ponies enabled them to escape from the pursuing gendarmes. For a long time the Suffragan Bishop of Posen, Dr. Janiszewski, who had suffered "deposition" and imprisonment,** was in hiding at our house. My brother and I used to attend him during his walks, to
protect him against possible dangers in the shape of police. Another "deposed" bishop,** Dr. Martin, of Paderborn, was interned in the fortress of Wesel, at no great distance from our home. He managed to send us word by the pastor of Guelders that he should escape on a certain night, and hoped for our assistance. My eldest brother and I set out by two different roads to meet him, and my brother, who found him, took him across the Dutch frontier.

At Cologne I myself was a witness of the arrest of Archbishop Melchers and heard the many-headed multitude sing as an accompaniment to the abominable conduct of the police, the beautiful hymn: "Wir sind im wahren Christentum, Herr Gott, dir glauben wir." ("We are within true Christianity, Lord it's thou, that we're believing in.")
A few days after I saw the Archbishop in his cell and read in the prison register, among thieves and rogues, the entry: "Melchers, Paul, Dr., basket-maker."
No wonder that a time that provided such experiences should have turned my mind again to spiritual instead of temporal things. The self-sacrifice of priests and bishops, which was ever before my eyes, was a constant admonition to me not to forget the sacrifice which I, too, owed to God."

Could this possibly be a little bit beneficial on the next opportunity for proper dinner conversation, Greg?
We have to be on our guard against illusions. Always.
Not politics as we know it until the world wide web came into existence, but the cultural grasp is, I think, the decisive power factor that we're dealing with. Let's not forget for a second, that we wouldn't have no chance at all to become aware of a Jesus (Santa) and Lucifer (Satan) simultaneously incorporating black brotherhood of highest trained priest agents with its hidden "holy" hegemony (over all kinds of more or less enlightened officers) on a global scale, at least not on a relevant level of public interest, not to mention public awareness.
Without Internet we were mentally and politically dependent as before on a bunch of leading figures as artists, priests, experts, politicians, celebrities, anchor persons and what not with their public debates defining opinion streams also further on. But we aren't! In principle, there is no longer need for (high-level, untouchably powerful) representatives when everyone can communicate with any other individual in the native environs as well as on the planet. In principle, as I said.
Can you imagine where we would be today without these transcontinental data highways?

Michael F. Scheuer CIA & CBS

May 1, 2009

shepherd's fold vs. selfdribbling basketballs

"Soul and spirit are not the same concept. A soul is that which gives life to a living body. A spirit is that which can exist and act without a body. We see by their different definitions that soul and spirit are not necessarily to be equated. The only case where we find a soul, which is also a spirit, is in that of the human soul." Speaking of "natural and supernatural organisms", what's about all the generations who lived and died before Mary gave birth to her son at one night in Bethlehem? Shouldn't they have had no chance at all to "become saved"? Well, it is "the most important question" for you, Marilynn, isn't it? And how can Jesus be "a son of the creator" when Adam is apparently none?

Followers of the papacy seem to be furthermore deeply caught in another pincers: "Christ gave to his church a twofold source of unity, a twofold guide. One is an interior guide, the Light of Faith, the other is an exterior guide, the Voice of Peter. For Catholics those two guides must always go together. One without the other will not stand. The light of faith (if the voice of Peter is rejected) will go out. The voice of Peter (without the light of faith) will be rejected. Once one rejects this twofold source of guidance that God has given, he is no longer guided by the light of faith, but only by human reason which has been obscured by original sin. Such a one (whether he knows it or not) is given to wishful thinking, for that is one of the weaknesses of our fallen nature. That is, we easily justify doing what we want to do, or not doing what we do not want to do. This is because our judgements are colored or slanted by our desires. And the greater our attachment to some created good, some satisfaction, the more our bodily and rational appetites tend to obscure our reason, and the more we are given to this self-deception.
That is why our conscience, which is simply a practical judgement of the intellect, is not always a reliable guide."

With the next step of this mindset you encounter the mightiest Fuehrer/Pharaoh who've ever lived, whose Jesuit Shepherd's Fold rules all nations on the planet for over 60 years by now, Ignatius Loyola: "I beseech you, bestir you to subjugate and subdue the most highbred and difficult part of your mind: reason and judgement."
THE MOST HIGHBRED PART – "shall" THAT, the enthusiastic Untertan (subject), "be bound in heaven"?? (Mt. 16:19)
Here comes why Terence McKenna has risen, in my opinion, to one of the most important spiritual as intellectual opponents resp. competitors of the Superior General of the Papal Secret Service.

Seeking the Stone:
"As many of you know, I am a great fan and spokesman for Psilocybin, for the Mushrooms. The Mushrooms that I am so stoked on, were discovered in 1953 by Gordon and Valentina Wasson. Discovered in 1953. Made absolutely Schedule One illegal in 1966. 13 years was the window in which Western civilization had to study this compound and figure out what it was for, and they were just beginning to focus upon it, when it was made illegal!
LSD discovered in 1937. Not brought into the scientific literature until 1948. Not generally available I believe in the laboratories until 1950. Made total illegal in 1966. 16 years window! Think about the fact, that when LSD was legal, psychiatrists, professional researchers were consistently reporting cures of chronic alcoholism with one 500 gamma dose. One dose cure … like a 50% curing rate without recidivism for chronic alcoholism. Spectacular findings were being reported! When LSD swept through the scientific community, for pharmacologists, for psychotherapists, for psychiatrists it had the same kind of excitement and feeling of breakthrough, that the splitting of the atom had for the physics community in the late 30s.

Well, science we are told, is this absolutely impartial godlike "body of knowledge" prosecuted by great men. And it will fearlessly send its questing mind into any situation or environment. This is a mental discipline so dispassionate, that it sees nothing at all wrong with strapping monkeys into apparatus and hurling them into walls with 70 miles an hour to study dramatic injuries.
This is a discipline so unflinching in its pursue of truth that it will design tiny television cameras to be implanted in plastic penises, so that we can see the changes in the colour of the vaginal wall as it approaches orgasm. These guys are unstinting in their devotion to truth in any form. And yet, and yet … For 30 years science has accepted government's refusal to allow science to look at the potential impact of psychedelic plants and compounds on human consciousness, on chronic alcoholism, on schizophrenia, on depression, on autism, on learning disorders, on dyslexias, on memory enhancements so forth and so on.
This to me is obscene! The future is mental! Figure it out! If the mind does not loom large in the future history of this species then what the hell future is it going to be?! I mean, this is our crowning glory!"

Drugs & Evolution

self-dribbling jewelled basketballs
"The problem is, you recall I've said the only last 5 minutes. So, unusual amounts of it in the body are very quickly brought down to base line – one of the most transient drugs in the body ever observed! So, and an interesting thing about that, Art, is, when they measured presence, they looked at human cerebrospinal fluid, and they discovered that it reaches its greatest concentration there between three and four in the morning. Well, that's when people are doing the intense REM dreaming.
And so I think, you know, the Australien Aborigines have this concept of the dream time. And I think, when you put the dream time, the chemestry of DMT, the abduction stories together, and the depth with which modern media had programmed and messed with people, you're very closed to being able to begin to talk about the alien phenomenon.
I think there are aliens, but I think they can only reach us through our mind. They don't cross the universe in ships of titanium. They don't even project holograms of themselves into the desert air. They come through the human mind! And if you look at the human mind in all cultures and in all kinds and places – except Western Europe in a few intellectuals in the past few hundred years – the human mind had always been haunted by sprites, gnomes, nixies, elves.
So, I don't see the UFO, the modern wave, as anything more than the latest wave of this mysterious relationship we have with this embodied mind through the imagination. Well, then people say: 'Oh, this is the old psychological reduction argument.' No. Because when I say the human imagination, I don't mean some poultry psychological function. I think the human imagination is the largest part of us and where we're going to stand most of the rest of human history."

"Television is the most powerful weapon of psychological warfare in history and yet it is a member of the family in most households. The programming that we are constantly assaulted with conditions us to a particular worldview. This fake reality changes our behavior making us less active and more compliant with society's shortcomings. Since television is controlled by a small handful of powerful corporations, viewers will never witness informing, truthful news and entertainment. As political and corporate power unite at an ever increasing rate, being informed is more important than ever. People need to seek out independent and alternative unbiased sources on the internet for their information or we will continue to be manipulated by the corporate controlled media."

I cannot even watch television anymore, actually since November 2001 already. And what happened in November 2008?
Internet ousts Television as Favorite Medium among Teenagers in Europe

"Barack Hussein Obama may yet turn out to be the best thing that ever happened to the United States of America. Obama has been caught in lie after lie. His National Security Advisor has stated he takes his daily orders from Henry Kissinger, the one man widely viewed as the architect of our disastrous Foreign Policy, the policy which has done so much to turn foreign extremists into implacable enemies. [...] Americans now more clearly see that individuals, working at the local level, can take care of local problems better than a faceless, bloated and entrenched bureaucracy in Washington, D.C. More and more are realizing that citizens must regain their rights as free individuals. [...] True freedom is on the move. This is why I like Barack Hussein Obama."

The Anti-Jew